Within 5 km in a straight line, not walking distance. Closest first, from our current analyzed sample. Hotel links may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you; commission does not affect this selection.[source]

560 m straight-line distance
A well-located apartment-style stay with modern, generally well-equipped rooms, kitchens and useful workspaces. The main risks are variable room layouts, inconsistent cleanliness and housekeeping, weak sound insulation, unreliable Wi-Fi and documented air-conditioning failures. The evidence supports a mixed choice rather than a uniformly dependable stay.
Less suitable for: Light sleepers or noise-sensitive travelers
Read the hotel evidence →485 guest reviews analyzed. Read room-specific trade-offs before booking.
Booking links may earn us a commission.

900 m straight-line distance
The clearest advantage is the convenient, walkable location near restaurants, shops, attractions and coworking. The main tradeoff is that rooms may look spacious and bright, but guest reports document serious cleanliness, maintenance, noise and bed-comfort problems. Workspace, breakfast, Wi-Fi and service are inconsistent or limited.
Less suitable for: Light sleepers or noise-sensitive travelers.
Read the hotel evidence →685 guest reviews analyzed. Read room-specific trade-offs before booking.
Booking links may earn us a commission.

1.2 km straight-line distance
A spacious, well-equipped apartment stay with excellent access to shopping and dining, but meaningful uncertainty around sleep, maintenance, housekeeping and hotel-style services. Room orientation is especially important.
Less suitable for: Light sleepers unwilling to request a rear-facing room.
Read the hotel evidence →167 guest reviews analyzed. Read room-specific trade-offs before booking.
Booking links may earn us a commission.

1.3 km straight-line distance
A location-led stay with spacious rooms, generally positive cleanliness and friendly service. The main tradeoffs are inconsistent noise and bathrooms, a weak or unreliable gym, limited paid dining, and mixed value.
Less suitable for: Travelers needing a dependable, fully operational gym.
Read the hotel evidence →91 guest reviews analyzed. Read room-specific trade-offs before booking.
Booking links may earn us a commission.

1.3 km straight-line distance
A strong-location hotel with attractive views, a documented desk, a well-equipped gym and generally good cleanliness. The tradeoffs are inconsistent room and bathroom quality, meaningful sleep-noise risk, uneven service, no swimming pool, and weak date-sensitive value. Recent evidence also indicates active work-related disruption, with no established end date.
Less suitable for: Light sleepers who need reliably strong sound insulation.
Read the hotel evidence →479 guest reviews analyzed. Read room-specific trade-offs before booking.
Booking links may earn us a commission.

2.7 km straight-line distance
A characterful, spacious-feeling property in a very strong Chapultepec location, with generally praised food and often friendly staff. The central tradeoff is substantial uncertainty around room condition, cleanliness, maintenance, noise, beds, and check-in reliability.
Less suitable for: Travelers requiring consistently modern, well-maintained or highly clean rooms.
Read the hotel evidence →138 guest reviews analyzed. Read room-specific trade-offs before booking.
Booking links may earn us a commission.