Kuala Lumpur / The stay, beyond the listing

Hotel Min Cott

B-G-1, Kuchai Exchange, No 43 , Jalan Kuchai Maju 13,

The LodgeLens take

Check the pool findings before booking

A practical, moderately priced base with convenient local access, but substantial tradeoffs in sleep, cleanliness, maintenance and internet reliability. Room layouts and desks are documented, while guest experiences vary considerably. Breakfast quality and availability are not established.

Worth checking: 3 of the 64 reviews in our sample contain a complaint about insects and pests. See the evidence

Read this one lightly. We hold 64 analyzed reviews for this property. This is a small sample; use the findings as leads to verify with the hotel.

Published property photos · may not show current condition

Published photos, not an inspection. Confirm the exact room and current facilities.

1 / 23
Use the arrow keys to browse

Seen from USD 29 a night on sample dates

Useful findings, with limits Guest feedback here comes from Booking.com only.See coverage & dates ↗

Who it may suit

  • Short stays where local convenience and a low observed rate matter most
  • Travelers using the property mainly as a practical base
  • Guests who can tolerate dated facilities and variable room conditions

Strongest: Location and getting around 7.0, Working from the room 5.5, Price and value 5.5

Think twice if

  • Light sleepers or travelers sensitive to traffic and neighboring-room noise
  • Remote workers requiring dependable Wi-Fi or video calls
  • Travelers prioritizing strong hygiene, modern maintenance or resort facilities

Weakest: Pool 0.0, Wi-Fi 2.0, Sleep and noise 3.5

If it sounds right

Check your dates

We observed USD 29–29 a night on sample dates. Live prices move with the calendar.

We may earn a commission if you book through these links. Commission does not affect our analysis or scores.

Compare the same room, dates and guest count. Check taxes, breakfast and cancellation terms before paying.

Choose the room, not just the hotel

A little care here can change your stay.

Compare the room labels attached to guest reviews. Samples vary; a higher stay rating alone does not prove a better room. Check the exact bed, layout and inclusions before paying.

Most reviewed room41 reviews

Superior Double or Twin Room

Double or twin beds

6.5 /10Average stay rating
2 / 41Reviews raising noise

Why consider it

Rooms shown have desks, beds, windows and usable floor space.

Check before paying

Beds and pillows receive mixed feedback, including complaints about poor beds and thin pillows.

More room notes

More reasons to consider it

  • One supplied review describes the room as spacious and clean.

More to check

  • Recent supplied reviews describe aged facilities and maintenance issues.
Small review sample15 reviews

Deluxe Double or Twin Room

Double or twin beds

6.1 /10Average stay rating
1 / 15Reviews raising noise

Why consider it

Some photographed rooms have broad windows and visible exterior outlooks.

Check before paying

Supplied reviews report stained linens, leaking fixtures, unstable water pressure and dated interiors.

More room notes

More reasons to consider it

  • Desks and chairs are shown.

More to check

  • Photographs are marketing images and cannot establish cleanliness or wear.
Small review sample8 reviews

Family Room

Multiple beds

4.9 /10Average stay rating
0 / 8Reviews raising noise

Why consider it

A supplied review describes one room as spacious, clean and comfortable.

Check before paying

Supplied reviews report bed-bug concerns, cockroaches, poor air-conditioning and dirty items.

More room notes

More to check

  • No advertised room size was supplied.

Make the room request specific

A useful note for the hotel

Select a room above, then copy an enquiry to use before booking. Nothing is sent from this page.

Preview the enquiry

No room selected. The enquiry will ask about the hotel generally.

A closer look, on your terms

What matters for your stay?

Choose a priority to focus the review. Scores are our AI-assisted evidence assessments out of 10, separate from hotel stars and provider ratings.

11 topics · open any evidence panel for guest quotes, photos and how the score was formed.

Will you actually sleep here?

Sleep and noise

3.5/10

11 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026.

Sleeping here is a weak point.

Check before bookingSupplied reviews report substantial noise from neighboring rooms, hallway activity, and highway traffic.

Guest evidence & score details

Sleeping here is a weak point. Some guests find the rooms comfortable, but noise from neighbors, hallways and traffic, along with mixed bed and pillow feedback, drags this down. Light sleepers and taller guests should look elsewhere or request a quiet room.

  • Bed comfortguest review evidence
    5.0
  • Soundproofingguest review evidence
    3.0
  • Pillowsguest review evidence
    4.0
Beds and pillows10 reviews
8 disliked2 likedlast mentioned Jun 2026
Noise2 reviews
2 disliked0 likedlast mentioned Oct 2024
Street and traffic noise2%
raised by 1 of 64last Jul 2024

What guests complained about

The location is very noisy

Booking.com · rated 5/10 · January 2024 · Superior Double or Twin Room

Bed a bit small because I am tall

Booking.com · rated 8/10 · June 2025 · Superior Double or Twin Room
How we got to 3.5

Overall sleep prospects are below average because guest reports document weak sound insulation, neighboring-room noise, and highway traffic. Bed comfort is mixed and pillow quality is often criticized. Blackout performance is unverified; supplied photographs show curtains but cannot establish their effectiveness.

Supports the score
  • Some guests describe the room as comfortable.
  • Curtains are visible in supplied room photographs, but blackout performance is unverified.
Pulls the score down
  • Supplied reviews report substantial noise from neighboring rooms, hallway activity, and highway traffic.
  • Bed and pillow feedback is mixed, including complaints about an uncomfortable bed and thin or flat pillows.

Evidence confidence: higher. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.

What are the rooms actually like?

Rooms

5.2/10

18 reviews about this · 15 photos available · analyzed Oct 2026.

The rooms are average rather than a clear strength. Guests praise the space and occasional views, but beds, pillows and bathroom cleanliness draw repeated complaints, including stained fixtures. It may suit a short, budget-focused stay if polished bathrooms and bedding are not priorities.

Guest evidence & score details
Beds and pillows10 reviews
8 disliked2 likedlast mentioned Jun 2026
Bathrooms8 reviews
6 disliked2 likedlast mentioned Oct 2026
Room size1 review
0 disliked1 likedlast mentioned Jul 2024
Views1 review
0 disliked1 likedlast mentioned Sept 2026

What guests liked

the toilet paper is better than when I was at Pacific Regency which is meant to be a 5 star hotel

Booking.com · rated 5/10 · January 2024 · Superior Double or Twin Room

What guests complained about

Bed a bit small because I am tall

Booking.com · rated 8/10 · June 2025 · Superior Double or Twin Room

toilet bowl still have urine stain and the cup is the most terrible ( looks like not wash at all after use )

Booking.com · rated 4/10 · July 2025 · Deluxe Double or Twin Room

Is it clean and well kept?

Cleanliness and condition

4.0/10

22 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026.

Cleanliness and upkeep are inconsistent.

Check before bookingSupplied reviews document stained or malodorous towels, dirty cups, toilet staining, dust, pests and leakage.

Guest evidence & score details

Cleanliness and upkeep are inconsistent. Some guests describe clean rooms, but others report stained or smelly towels, dirty cups, toilet marks, pests, leaks and worn furnishings. Travelers who expect a fresh, modern room should keep expectations modest.

  • Cleanlinessguest review evidence
    4.0
  • Room upkeepguest review evidence
    4.0
  • Common areasphotos and reviews
    6.0
  • Feels currentfrom the photos
    4.0
Cleanliness18 reviews
6 disliked12 likedlast mentioned Oct 2026
Insects and pests5%
raised by 3 of 64last Jun 2026

Those who complained rated the whole stay 3.33/10 on average.

Plumbing, drainage and hot water5%
raised by 3 of 64last Oct 2026

Those who complained rated the whole stay 3/10 on average.

Wear and maintenance3%
raised by 2 of 64last Nov 2024

What guests liked

Very clean bedroom and staff here are friendly

Booking.com · rated 9/10 · August 2024 · Superior Double or Twin Room

What guests complained about

The towels were stained and yellowish

Booking.com · rated 6/10 · January 2026 · Deluxe Double or Twin Room

It isn't the air con is broken

Booking.com · rated 5/10 · January 2024 · Superior Double or Twin Room
How we got to 4.0

Score 4/10. Overall condition is constrained by documented cleanliness failures, pests, plumbing leakage and multiple reports of aged or run-down facilities. Some reviews report clean rooms, and supplied photographs show orderly visible spaces, but these positives do not resolve the conflicting guest evidence.

Supports the score
  • Several supplied reviews describe rooms as clean.
  • Photographs show generally orderly rooms, bathrooms, corridors and lobby, though photography cannot establish lived cleanliness.
Pulls the score down
  • Supplied reviews document stained or malodorous towels, dirty cups, toilet staining, dust, pests and leakage.
  • Supplied reviews also describe aged or run-down furnishings and facilities.

Evidence confidence: higher. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.

Do the staff fix things when they go wrong?

Staff and service

5.0/10

20 reviews about this · 3 photos available · analyzed Oct 2026.

Service is mixed but can be friendly and helpful. Guests praise staff, while check-in, housekeeping lapses and an occasional poor attitude cause frustration. It is workable for travelers who do not need much problem-solving or a particularly smooth arrival.

Guest evidence & score details
  • Friendlinessguest review evidence
    5.5
  • Responsivenessguest review evidence
    5.0
  • Check-inguest review evidence
    4.0
  • Problem solvingguest review evidence
    4.5
Staff and service18 reviews
8 disliked10 likedlast mentioned Sept 2026
Check-in and check-out4 reviews
3 disliked0 likedlast mentioned Mar 2026
Housekeeping1 review
1 disliked0 likedlast mentioned Jan 2026

What guests liked

Friendly and helpful staff

Booking.com · rated 7/10 · December 2025 · Superior Double or Twin Room

What guests complained about

The male staff member on night duty had a bad attitude

Booking.com · rated 7/10 · September 2026 · Superior Double or Twin Room

their check-out day is the next day

Booking.com · rated 5/10 · January 2025 · Superior Double or Twin Room

Is breakfast worth booking?

Breakfast and dining

5.0/10

1 review about this · 2 photos available · analyzed Oct 2026. Limited evidence: treat this assessment as provisional. Confidence is low because the available sources are limited or inconsistent.

There is not enough evidence to say breakfast is worth booking.

Check before bookingNo supplied evidence confirms breakfast availability, inclusion, price, buffet format, menu variety, coffee quality or food quality.

Guest evidence & score details

There is not enough evidence to say breakfast is worth booking. The on-site restaurant and bar receive a positive mention, but breakfast availability, price, quality and format are unconfirmed. Check the current offering before paying extra.

On-site restaurant and bar1 review
0 disliked1 likedlast mentioned Feb 2025

What guests liked

safety and restaurants

Booking.com · rated 9/10 · February 2025 · Deluxe Double or Twin Room
How we got to 5.0

A middle score reflects that a dining room is documented, but the supplied evidence does not establish the actual breakfast or dining experience. Confidence is low because most requested attributes are unverified.

Supports the score
  • Dining room is photographed with two tables, chairs, ceiling fans and a large window.
  • The stored corpus contains one detected praise mention for the on-site restaurant and bar.
Pulls the score down
  • No supplied evidence confirms breakfast availability, inclusion, price, buffet format, menu variety, coffee quality or food quality.
  • The supplied photograph shows tables but no food service or buffet setup.
  • Crowding cannot be established from one staged photograph.

Evidence confidence: limited. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.

Is the pool as good as the photos?

Pool

Not on site

0 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026. Limited evidence: treat this assessment as provisional. Confidence is low because the available sources are limited or inconsistent.

No supplied evidence confirms that Hotel Min Cott has a swimming pool.

Check before bookingNo supplied source confirms a swimming pool or provides pool-area observations.

Guest evidence & score details

No supplied evidence confirms that Hotel Min Cott has a swimming pool. Do not book it expecting pool facilities.

How we got to 0.0

No swimming pool is documented in the supplied property facilities, photographs, or review text. The retrieved review query labels are not guest evidence, so pool quality cannot be established; this is an evidence-availability score, not proof that no pool exists.

Pulls the score down
  • No supplied source confirms a swimming pool or provides pool-area observations.

Evidence confidence: limited. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.

How well placed is it, really?

Location and getting around

7.0/10

5 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026.

The location is one of the hotel's better features.

Check before bookingWalking-distance evidence is limited and mixed: one supplied review specifically says there is not much food in walking distance.

Guest evidence & score details

The location is one of the hotel's better features. Cafés, groceries, restaurants, pharmacies and public transport are nearby, with Kuchai MRT accessible, though some guests find food less convenient on foot and nearby venues may add noise. It suits travelers prioritizing local access over a quiet neighborhood.

  • Walkabilitymeasured from the map
    7.0
  • Neighbourhood quietguest review evidence
    5.0
Public transport3 reviews
0 disliked3 likedlast mentioned Jun 2026
Walking distance to things1 review
1 disliked0 likedlast mentioned Apr 2024
Feeling safe1 review
0 disliked1 likedlast mentioned Feb 2025

What guests liked

easy access to Kuchai Station

Booking.com · rated 9/10 · August 2024 · Superior Double or Twin Room

safety and restaurants

Booking.com · rated 9/10 · February 2025 · Deluxe Double or Twin Room

What guests complained about

Not much food in walking distance sadly

Booking.com · rated 9/10 · April 2024 · Deluxe Double or Twin Room
How we got to 7.0

The immediate area offers strong everyday convenience and reasonable transit access, with restaurants, cafés, groceries and pharmacies nearby. The score is moderated because tourist access, sidewalk quality and actual walking comfort are not established, and late-night venues are close by.

Supports the score
  • Numerous cafés, groceries, pharmacies and restaurants are nearby.
  • Public transport is available, including Kuchai MRT Station at an estimated 0.52 km.
  • Recent reviews describe the location as convenient and near TBS, restaurants, Bukit Jalil and local amenities.
Pulls the score down
  • Walking-distance evidence is limited and mixed: one supplied review specifically says there is not much food in walking distance.
  • Several late-night venues are within approximately 0.14–0.25 km, creating a potential noise consideration.
  • Sidewalk quality and tourist-oriented access are not documented.

Evidence confidence: moderate. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.

Can you work or take calls from the room?

Wi-Fi

2.0/10

3 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026.

Wi-Fi is a serious weakness for working or taking calls.

Check before bookingSupplied reviews document very slow or unusable internet, including for work.

Guest evidence & score details

Wi-Fi is a serious weakness for working or taking calls. Guests report internet that is very slow or unusable for work, with no reliable positive performance evidence. Remote workers should plan to use mobile data or choose another hotel.

  • Reliabilityguest review evidence
    2.0
  • Video callsguest review evidence
    2.0
Wi-Fi and internet3 reviews
3 disliked0 likedlast mentioned Oct 2026

What guests complained about

The internet is super slow that I can't use it for work

Booking.com · rated 6/10 · January 2026 · Deluxe Double or Twin Room
How we got to 2.0

Score 2/10. Internet availability is documented, but the supplied corpus statistics show three detected Wi-Fi complaints and no detected praise. Individual reviews describe internet too slow for work and Wi-Fi that could not work. No measured speeds or dependable positive evidence are supplied.

Supports the score
  • Internet is listed as an available facility.
Pulls the score down
  • Supplied reviews document very slow or unusable internet, including for work.
  • No supplied speed measurements or positive Wi-Fi reports establish dependable performance.

Evidence confidence: higher. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.

Is the desk usable for a working day?

Working from the room

5.5/10

3 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026.

The room can support basic laptop work, with a desk and chair visible in some room evidence, but setup details vary.

Check before bookingA supplied review reports “no chair,” creating room-type or evidence conflict.

Guest evidence & score details

The room can support basic laptop work, with a desk and chair visible in some room evidence, but setup details vary. Guests report missing chairs, inconvenient power access and Wi-Fi too slow for work. It is better for occasional tasks than a full working day.

  • Chairfrom the photos
    4.5
Wi-Fi and internet3 reviews
3 disliked0 likedlast mentioned Oct 2026
Desk and working space1 review
1 disliked0 likedlast mentioned Jan 2026

What guests complained about

I had to use my own mobile hotspot in order to work from hotel

Booking.com · rated 6/10 · January 2026 · Deluxe Double or Twin Room

The internet is super slow that I can't use it for work

Booking.com · rated 6/10 · January 2026 · Deluxe Double or Twin Room
How we got to 5.5

The photograph supports a usable desk-and-chair setup, but the score is moderated by one supplied complaint about the absence of a chair and by unknown outlet placement and dimensions. The evidence does not establish a consistently equipped workspace across room types.

Supports the score
  • A proper desk and chair are visible in the supplied room photograph.
  • The desk appears suitable for basic laptop work.
Pulls the score down
  • A supplied review reports “no chair,” creating room-type or evidence conflict.
  • A supplied review reports no power socket at the bedside table; outlet placement at the desk is not established.
  • Desk dimensions, ergonomic quality, monitor suitability, and natural-light experience are not established.

Evidence confidence: moderate. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.

Is there anywhere to train?

Gym

Not on site

0 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026. Limited evidence: treat this assessment as provisional.

No supplied evidence confirms a gym at Hotel Min Cott.

Check before bookingNo gym is documented in the supplied facilities or photographs.

Guest evidence & score details

No supplied evidence confirms a gym at Hotel Min Cott. Guests needing on-site exercise facilities should not rely on this hotel.

How we got to 0.0

Scored 0 because no gym or fitness room is documented in the supplied hotel data. This is an evidence-based absence of documentation, not confirmation that the property definitively has no gym.

Pulls the score down
  • No gym is documented in the supplied facilities or photographs.
  • Equipment, size, lighting, condition, and crowding cannot be assessed from the supplied evidence.

Evidence confidence: moderate. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.

Is it worth the money?

Price and value

5.5/10

6 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026. Limited evidence: treat this assessment as provisional. Confidence is low because the available sources are limited or inconsistent.

Value is uneven rather than compelling. Some guests see it as reasonably cheap for a three-star stay, while others consider the price too high for the condition and facilities. It makes the most sense for budget-conscious travelers who value location and can accept basic, inconsistent rooms.

Guest evidence & score details
Value for money6 reviews
4 disliked2 likedlast mentioned Jul 2025

What guests liked

It was cheap(ish) For a 3 star hotel

Booking.com · rated 5/10 · January 2024 · Superior Double or Twin Room

What guests complained about

price is expensive not worth what it cost

Booking.com · rated 1/10 · September 2024 · Superior Double or Twin Room

Patterns in the reviews we analyzed

What to check before you commit

Patterns from 64 analyzed reviews. Use them to ask better questions: review counts are not a prediction of your stay, and text interpretation can miss nuance.

Insects and pests

Lower concern

3 of 64 reviews contain a complaint about this.

See the pattern & what to do

3 of 3 classified opinions about this were negative — 100% of these opinions. 2 of those are from the last 730 days. 3 of 64 reviews mention it at all.

There were cockroach behind the bed

Booking.com · rated 1/10 · June 2026 · Family Room

There were bed bugs in one of the rooms

Booking.com · rated 8/10 · November 2023 · Superior Double or Twin Room

Plumbing, drainage and hot water

Lower concern

3 of 64 reviews contain a complaint about this.

See the pattern & what to do

3 of 3 classified opinions about this were negative — 100% of these opinions. 1 of those are from the last 730 days. 3 of 64 reviews mention it at all.

The connection of the shower n bidet were leaking

Booking.com · rated 5/10 · October 2026 · Superior Double or Twin Room

Get a feel for the neighbourhood

The world outside the lobby

26 mapped places sit within a five-minute walk. Distances are straight-line, converted to walking time at 80 m per minute with a 25% detour allowance.

Landmarks and transport

  • RUANG by Cookiez Bar, Kuchai Lama0.027 km
  • Citycare Pharmacy Jalan Kuchai Lama @ NSK0.113 km
  • Golden Palace KTV0.142 km
  • Purigene NSK Kuchai Lama0.165 km
  • Kuchai MRT Station0.521 km
  • Suvarnabhumi Airport1183.76 km
  • Silom1190.34 km
  • Asok1190.96 km

We have no confirmed rail or metro station in this map sample. Check the public-transport places below and verify the route to your destinations.

Explore food, transport and everyday essentials nearby

Eating and drinking

Bars5 mapped · 4 within 5 min
Restaurants5 mapped · 5 within 5 min

Cafés and workspaces

Cafés5 mapped · 5 within 5 min
Coworking1 mapped

Everyday essentials

Pharmacies5 mapped · 2 within 5 min
Groceries5 mapped · 2 within 5 min
Convenience5 mapped · 5 within 5 min
Laundry5 mapped · 3 within 5 min
Shopping2 mapped

Getting around

Public transport5 mapped

Exercise

Yoga studios3 mapped

Worth knowing about

Late-night venues3 mapped · 3 within 5 min

Within 500 m: Golden Palace KTV (2 min), 白宫 The White House Ktv Kuchai Lama (3 min), DC Club (4 min). Late-night venues this close are worth knowing about if you are a light sleeper.

Turn the findings into a better stay

Confirm these details before booking

Reviews and photos describe other people’s stays. The terms and room assigned to your reservation matter just as much.

For your reservation

  • Exact room category, bed arrangement and maximum occupancy; requests such as a high floor may not be guaranteed.
  • Total price for your dates, including taxes, service fees, breakfast and any deposit.
  • Cancellation deadline, payment timing and whether the rate is refundable.
  • Current opening hours, closures or extra charges for the facilities you need.

Questions raised by this hotel’s evidence

  • Which room locations are quietest, and can a quiet room be guaranteed?
  • Could you share recent photos of the exact room category and bathroom I would book?
  • Is the in-room Wi-Fi currently reliable for video calls, and is a recent speed test available?
  • Is there a fully closing door between the bathroom and bedroom?

Observations for specific dates, not a quote

What it costs

These are historical observations, not live availability. Room types, occupancy, taxes and cancellation rules may differ between samples. Check the final total with the provider.

USD 29–29per night on sampled dates · historical observations

See sample dates and recorded rates
USD 292026-10-25 → 2026-10-27booking.com
USD 292026-12-10 → 2026-12-12booking.com

Good value when: Likely better for short stays when the observed rate is about USD 28.77–28.84 per night before the listed taxes, especially when free parking or location convenience matters.

Poor value when: Less compelling when room condition and included amenities matter more: supplied reviews mention aged facilities, missing or chargeable items, and documented experiences described as not worth the price.

Short answers

Common questions about Hotel Min Cott

Is Hotel Min Cott noisy?

2 of 64 reviews mention noise. Of the 2 reviewers mentioning it, 2 described a problem and 0 described it positively. These are counts of the collected reviews, not all guests.

Jump to the detail

Is Hotel Min Cott in a good location?

26 mapped places sit within a five-minute walk. No rail or metro station was identified in the mapped data. Check public transport and practical routes before booking.

Jump to the detail

Is the pool at Hotel Min Cott any good?

It scores 0.0/10 here. 0 reviews mention the pool, 0 of them as a complaint. No swimming pool is documented in the supplied property facilities, photographs, or review text. The retrieved review query labels are not guest evidence, so pool quality cannot be established; this is an evidence-availability score, not proof that no pool exists.

Jump to the detail

How much does Hotel Min Cott cost per night?

Rates we observed for the listed sample dates ran USD 29 to USD 29 a night, with a midpoint around USD 29. Prices move with dates and room type.

Jump to the detail

Who should not book Hotel Min Cott?

Light sleepers or travelers sensitive to traffic and neighboring-room noise; Remote workers requiring dependable Wi-Fi or video calls; Travelers prioritizing strong hygiene, modern maintenance or resort facilities.

Jump to the detail

Working while you stay

Places to work near Hotel Min Cott

Reviewed coworking spaces and work-friendly cafés within 3 km in a straight line. Check the actual journey, opening hours and any day-pass or laptop rules before you go.

See the best coworking spaces in Kuala Lumpur →

Compare what matters to your stay

Other hotels and focused shortlists

These comparisons use hotels in our analyzed collection. Follow a hotel’s review to check its trade-offs and source coverage.

Compare the Kuala Lumpur hotels we have analyzed →

Next step

Not sure this is the right one?

LodgeLens ranks properties against what you personally need — quiet, a real desk, a pool worth using, a specific budget — instead of a single average score. Tell us what matters and we will send a shortlist for your dates.

Build my shortlist

What supports this review

Read with these limitations

64 reviews analyzed across 4 languages. Latest guest review: October 2026. 30 reviews from the last 12 months. Analysis: October 2026. How our analysis works

Sample dates: Oct 2023–Oct 2026. Average stay rating 6.2/10, normalized across sources. The latest 12 months average +0.2 points versus the full sample; changing guests and sources can affect this.

  • The review sample is small; treat recurring patterns cautiously.
  • No written Google reviews were collected.
  • No written Agoda reviews were collected.
  • The review sample is relatively small.
  • Guest feedback comes from one review provider.
  • Some review sources are missing or need refreshing.
Review sources, sample sizes and collection dates
Booking.com64 reviews collectedSource collected · October 2026
Google0 reviews collectedReview evidence unavailable · collection date unavailable
Agoda0 reviews collectedReview evidence unavailable · collection date unavailable

Our sample is not every review or every stay. Missing evidence does not establish that a facility is absent or a problem is resolved.

How this page was made

We hold 64 reviews for this property and analyzed 64 reviews across 4 languages. Text matching and AI interpretation can miss nuance, sarcasm or translations. Repeated experiences, larger samples and independent sources are more useful than a single vivid quote.

Quotes, however, are only ever drawn from the 40 English reviews. Machine-translating a guest’s sentence would change their original wording.

We count mentions using text patterns. Complaints can come from a reviewer’s “disliked” field or negative wording in their review. These counts describe the reviews we hold, not the proportion of all guests who experienced an issue. “Recent” means the last 730 days.

Scores, section explanations and photo descriptions come from a model reading the source material using AI, last run 11 October 2026. Published photos may be old, staged or incomplete; AI cannot measure a room or verify a facility is currently open. Nearby places are mapped within 1500 m; walking times are estimates, not checked routes. Prices are observations for sample dates and will move.

We link to a review or its source page when an address is available. Source, rating, and month accompany quotes to help you locate them. Some links open a collection of reviews rather than the individual quote.