Coworking review · Chiang Mai

Checked 9 Oct 2026

The Story 106 Co-Working Space &Cafe

Choose The Story 106 for a short, flexible laptop session if atmosphere matters more than office furniture and uninterrupted connectivity. Its upstairs workspace is well supported by guest accounts, but the positive reports do not erase repeated Wi-Fi restrictions, disruptive beepers or conflicting charging experiences.[source][source]

5.4/10LodgeLens assessment
5 supported categories · 100 review excerpts analyzed

Based on guest experiences and operator information. We have not visited or independently tested the space.

At a glance

Its strongest supported categories.

See every rating ↗
Location and access
7.0/10Moderate evidence confidence[source][source]
Desk and chair comfort
6.0/10Moderate evidence confidence[source]
Focus and noise
6.0/10Moderate evidence confidence[source]

The review, at a glance

The working-day verdict.

5.4/10LodgeLens analysis
5 supported categories

Choose The Story 106 for a short, flexible laptop session if atmosphere matters more than office furniture and uninterrupted connectivity. Its upstairs workspace is well supported by guest accounts, but the positive reports do not erase repeated Wi-Fi restrictions, disruptive beepers or conflicting charging experiences. Test your intended seat and connection before committing to a full day. For a month, current rates, access terms and a suitable workstation remain unverified; this evidence does not establish a dependable membership alternative. Call-heavy workers should be especially cautious.

[source][source]
100Review excerpts analyzed
5Supported rating categories
2Source records consulted
9 Oct 2026Analysis date

100 review excerpts analyzed from 152 substantive, distinct collected reviews. The sample draws from different rating bands, prioritizing newer reviews within each band. 1 review source is represented. The provider’s public rating count is separate from this sample.

Google: 4.4/5 from 526 public ratings. Reported by the provider ↗This is the provider’s aggregate, separate from the guest reviews we analyzed and from the LodgeLens rating.

Who it suits

A good fit when…

  • Solo workers and readers seeking a café atmosphere and an upstairs area where other guests are concentrating.[source]
  • Laptop-only visitors who can try a short session, confirm charging access and tolerate purchase-linked Wi-Fi limits.[source]

Who should look elsewhere

Less suitable when…

  • Workers needing uninterrupted internet for deadline-critical tasks, unless they first verify the connection and have an independent backup.[source]
  • People needing frequent online meetings or a substantial keyboard-and-laptop setup; quiet-space etiquette and historically small, casual furniture may be unsuitable.[source]

The scorecard

Seven parts of a good working day.

Each rating is supported by cited experiences or, for access, documented terms. An unrated category is an evidence gap, not a zero.

Focus and noise

6.0/10

Several 2026 guests describe concentrated upstairs working, but an October 2026 report still identifies disruptive food beepers. Quietness appears possible rather than dependable.[source]

Moderate evidence confidence · 4 cited guest reviews

Internet and connectivity

4.0/10

Positive July 2026 connectivity feedback conflicts with another July complaint and October reports of slow service. Repeated portal logins and time limits create additional practical friction.[source]

Higher evidence confidence · 4 cited guest reviews

Desk and chair comfort

6.0/10

Comfortable seating and September 2026 charging reports are encouraging, but August outlet complaints conflict. December 2025 descriptions of casual furniture and small tables remain relevant, not current verification.[source]

Moderate evidence confidence · 6 cited guest reviews

Calls and meetings

Unrated

Only one November 2025 guest directly discusses online meetings, finding them difficult in the quiet space. Their unused terrace observation does not establish reliable call facilities.[source]

Insufficient current evidence for a rating

Value for money

5.0/10

May 2026 reports support drink-based upstairs access, but also one-hour Wi-Fi limits and payment surcharges. January purchase-dependent longer codes suggest terms vary; current official rates remain unknown.[source][source]

Moderate evidence confidence · 3 cited guest reviews

Location and access

7.0/10

The documented Tha Phae Road address and listed daily 8 AM–9 PM hours offer useful planning information. Guest-reported parking limitations and unverified workspace entry rules temper confidence.[source][source]

Moderate evidence confidence · 2 cited guest reviews

Community

Unrated

February 2026 solo-worker observations and July 2025 afternoon crowds establish other users, not meaningful networking. No supplied guest evidence establishes events, introductions or an organized member community.[source]

Insufficient current evidence for a rating

The reasons to consider it

What works well.

  • An established upstairs shared workspace, repeatedly described as quiet and comfortable.[source]
  • September 2026 guests report extensive second-floor charging access, including a charging spot at each table.[source]
  • One May 2026 guest reports upstairs use with a drink purchase and no additional workspace charge.[source]

The compromises to understand

What could get in your way.

  • Repeated Wi-Fi login problems and purchase-linked time limits undermine confidence in uninterrupted work.[source]
  • Food-ready beepers can disrupt concentration, despite opposing reports of quiet upstairs conditions.[source]
  • Charging access is disputed, while December 2025 reports describe casual furniture and limited desk space.[source]
  • Current operator rates and membership terms are unavailable in the supplied evidence; listing hours do not establish coworking access rights.[source][source]

A closer look · Chapter 1

A pleasant upstairs workspace, with seat-dependent compromises

The strongest reason to try this branch is its recognizable upstairs working area. January and July 2026 guests describe comfortable seating and people quietly concentrating; a June 2026 guest reports a ground-floor no-laptop arrangement with laptops upstairs. Treat that as a reported rule, not a verified operator policy. The quietness evidence is genuinely divided: December 2025 visitors heard frequent upstairs beepers, and an October 2026 worker still found the food-ready devices disruptive. Later praise therefore does not establish that this problem has disappeared. Charging deserves an equally specific check. An August 2026 guest could not adequately charge a laptop, whereas September guests describe charging at every upstairs table. There is no documented renovation explaining the difference. December 2025 accounts also describe casual furniture and tables too small for a separate keyboard; these are historical warnings rather than confirmed current dimensions. Inspect the actual workstation before settling in, and consider a layer of clothing: a June 2026 worker found the café too cold to stay long.

[source]

A closer look · Chapter 2

Wi-Fi exists, but uninterrupted work is not assured

Connectivity is the clearest reason not to assume this is an office replacement. A July 2026 guest calls the connection fast and reliable, yet another July guest specifically criticizes second-floor Wi-Fi. An October 2026 worker reports multiple networks, passwords and slow speeds after logging in. A May 2026 repeat visitor describes disconnections and repeated portal authentication, alongside one-hour codes for drink purchases. These are guest experiences, not measurements or a universal rule for every purchase. January 2026 feedback instead mentions purchase-dependent codes lasting two to three hours. Ask which duration your order provides, whether each device needs separate access, and how renewal works before starting a deadline-sensitive task. Calls introduce a different uncertainty. A November 2025 digital nomad found online meetings difficult because the room was designed for quiet focus. That same person noticed, but did not use, a terrace apparently serving calls and smoking. This does not prove privacy, weather protection, call quality or guaranteed access, and there is insufficient direct call experience to score the category.

[source]

A closer look · Chapter 3

Drink-based access may suit a short visit; monthly terms are unknown

The supplied materials contain no current operator tariff, so there are no publishable day-pass or monthly prices here. A May 2026 guest says buying a drink allowed upstairs work without an extra charge. That is useful evidence for a café-style session, but it does not establish unlimited Wi-Fi or full-day rights: another May guest reports one-hour drink-linked codes and a 3% surcharge for non-cash/QR payments. January 2026 feedback describes longer codes tied to the purchased item and considers the arrangement worthwhile. These differences make the actual purchase conditions more important than a headline impression of affordability. Ask about workspace access, connection duration, payment fees and any longer-stay option separately. The Maps listing places the branch at 200 Tha Phae Road and lists 8 AM–9 PM daily, but its operating status is marked unknown; those hours are not independently confirmed coworking hours. A July 2026 guest reports no dedicated private parking. For a month-long decision, establish current opening, entry terms and a repeatable suitable seat before treating this as your regular base.

[source][source]

Understand the pass before you pay

Prices and access at The Story 106 Co-Working Space &Cafe.

Published prices checked within the last 30 days. These are not live quotes or a promise of desk availability.

We do not have a sufficiently recent, sourced price for this space. Ask the operator for a written quote including tax, hours and the facilities you need.

A day pass and a full-time membership can have different opening hours. Twenty-four-hour member access does not mean overnight access is included in a day pass.

Facilities in the evidence

Facilities for your workday.

Upstairs shared workspace
Reported in the source evidence[source]
Wi-Fi with reported purchase-linked, time-limited codes
Reported in the source evidence[source]
Charging outlets; availability disputed
Reported in the source evidence[source]
Air conditioning; one guest found it excessively cold
Reported in the source evidence[source]
Dedicated private parking, according to a guest
Reported unavailable[source]
Verified dedicated call space
Not confirmed

A useful first-day check

Try your real work setup.

Test a call from the area you would use. Check the desk, chair, power sockets and connection with your own device. Ask whether booths and meeting rooms need a reservation or cost extra.

A published facility tells you what to ask about. It does not establish measured speed, low noise, comfortable seating or spare capacity.

Read this before you go

The conditions that could change your choice.

  • Repeated Wi-Fi login problems and purchase-linked time limits undermine confidence in uninterrupted work.[source]
  • Food-ready beepers can disrupt concentration, despite opposing reports of quiet upstairs conditions.[source]
  • Charging access is disputed, while December 2025 reports describe casual furniture and limited desk space.[source]
  • Current operator rates and membership terms are unavailable in the supplied evidence; listing hours do not establish coworking access rights.[source][source]

Still to confirm

Leave room for the unknowns.

  • Verified dedicated call space is not currently verified.
  • Current pass and membership prices need confirmation with the operator.
  • Internet performance and noise during your actual working hours.
  • Seat availability and the total price for your chosen date.
Ask through the official website ↗

Make the whole day work

Hotels near The Story 106 Co-Working Space &Cafe.

A shorter journey, a better night’s sleep or a pool at the end of the day. Match your stay to what matters.

Within 5 km in a straight line, not walking distance. Sorted by the selected category score, then distance. Only hotels with a score of at least 7/10 and enough supporting evidence qualify. Hotel links may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you; commission does not affect this selection.[source]

Pool at Celosia Chiang Mai Hotel
890 m straight-line distancePrice and value 8.0/10

Celosia Chiang Mai Hotel

The hotel generally feels like good value, especially for travelers who prioritize location, staff and pool access. The value drops if you need a soft bed, consistently modern upkeep or dependable breakfast included in the rate.

Less suitable for: Light sleepers needing dependable soundproofing

Read the hotel evidence →

622 guest reviews analyzed. Category scores reflect our evidence assessment.

Booking links may earn us a commission.

Pool at Hongkhao Village
2.8 km straight-line distancePrice and value 8.0/10

Hongkhao Village

The hotel is generally considered good value, especially for its setting, service and distinctive atmosphere. Older rooms or isolated maintenance issues can weaken that impression. It is a strong choice when you want character and hospitality without paying for a highly polished resort.

Less suitable for: Light sleepers who need dependable sound isolation.

Read the hotel evidence →

754 guest reviews analyzed. Category scores reflect our evidence assessment.

Booking links may earn us a commission.

Pool at Hotel Sensai Nimman Chiang Mai - Adults Only
3.0 km straight-line distancePrice and value 8.0/10

Hotel Sensai Nimman Chiang Mai - Adults Only

The hotel generally feels like good value, especially for its design, location, service and comfortable rooms. Some guests still consider it expensive for what they receive, so the price matters.

Less suitable for: Light sleepers or guests requiring reliably quiet nights

Read the hotel evidence →

627 guest reviews analyzed. Category scores reflect our evidence assessment.

Booking links may earn us a commission.

Check the details for yourself

Sources and freshness.

  1. The Story 106 Co-Working Space &Cafe — collected Google review sample ↗review platform · Checked 9 Oct 2026
  2. The Story 106 Co-Working Space &Cafe — Google Maps listing ↗Map provider · Checked 9 Oct 2026
See the individual sourced claims
  • The listing gives the branch address as 200 Tha Phae Road, Chang Moi, Chiang Mai 50300, Thailand.[source]
  • The listing documents the supplied candidate coordinates.[source]
  • A guest describes a large upstairs coworking area.[source]

    Review posted

  • A guest reports a quiet second-floor coworking space with some tables offering outlets.[source]

    Review posted

  • A guest found the upstairs seating comfortable and the atmosphere quiet.[source]

    Review posted

  • A guest reported slow Wi-Fi after navigating multiple networks and passwords.[source]

    Review posted

  • The same guest found food-ready beepers disruptive while working.[source]

    Review posted

  • A guest complained that too few outlets prevented laptop charging.[source]

    Review posted

  • Another guest reported charging access at every second-floor table.[source]

    Review posted

  • A guest reports separate floor uses, with laptops upstairs and not on the ground floor.[source]

    Review posted

  • A guest experienced repeated portal logins and disconnections.[source]

    Review posted

  • A guest reports a payment surcharge and one-hour Wi-Fi codes for drink purchases.[source]

    Review posted

  • A guest found the Wi-Fi fast and reliable.[source]

    Review posted

  • A guest specifically criticized second-floor Wi-Fi.[source]

    Review posted

  • A guest reports upstairs access after buying a drink without an additional charge.[source]

    Review posted

  • A guest reports purchase-dependent Wi-Fi codes lasting two to three hours and considered this worthwhile.[source]

    Review posted

  • A guest describes casual furniture rather than office desks and chairs.[source]

    Review posted

  • A guest found tables too small for a laptop plus keyboard.[source]

    Review posted

  • A guest found the café too cold to stay long.[source]

    Review posted

  • A guest found online meetings difficult in the quiet workspace.[source]

    Review posted

  • A guest noticed a terrace apparently used for calls and smoking but did not use it.[source]

    Review posted

  • A guest observed many people attending alone to work or read.[source]

    Review posted

  • A guest reported afternoon crowds, mostly foreigners.[source]

    Review posted

  • The Maps listing gives 8 AM–9 PM hours for every day.[source]
  • A guest says the shop lacks a dedicated private parking lot.[source]

    Review posted

  • The listing provides a Facebook website and marks operating status unknown.[source]
  • A guest reports quiet upstairs conditions and outlets at every table.[source]

    Review posted

  • A guest experienced frequent upstairs beeper noise.[source]

    Review posted

Facility evidence is treated as current for up to 90 days; price evidence is shown for up to 30 days. After that, a new source check is needed. A rebuild does not reset a source’s check date.

How this guide is built

Individual findings drive the rankings.

Each review combines sourced guest experiences with operator information. We assess seven parts of the working day and explain the strengths, trade-offs and gaps. We have not visited or independently tested the spaces.

The overall rating is a weighted calculation from supported category scores. A rating needs at least four supported categories, two core work categories and five distinct cited guest reviews. A facility list or a public star rating alone is insufficient.

See the score weights and evidence rules
  • Focused work: 20%
  • Connectivity: 25%
  • Desk comfort: 15%
  • Calls & meetings: 15%
  • Value: 10%
  • Access: 10%
  • Community: 5%

Unavailable categories are left unrated, and weights are redistributed across the supported categories. Each needs confidence of at least 65% and two distinct cited guest reviews; access can instead use two documented facts. Value evidence expires after 30 days; other category evidence after 90 days.

Rankings use the calculated overall rating, then evidence confidence and analyzed review count, with a stable identifier as the final tie-break. Category shortlists use category score, confidence and the same stable identifier. Hotel commissions do not enter either calculation.

AI assists the individual analysis and writing. The city ordering is calculated directly from those individual findings. Google’s reported rating remains separate from our assessment.

Know something that has changed? Send a correction →

Find your working-day fit

One city. More ways to work.

A different neighbourhood, day-pass arrangement or access plan might suit your routine better. Compare the individual findings across Chiang Mai.

Explore the Chiang Mai guide →