Coworking review · Lisbon
Checked 9 Oct 2026Work@380 is a credible choice for a daytime working visit, especially if natural light, air conditioning and approachable hosts matter more than a documented networking programme. July and August 2026 guests support those strengths, while meeting-room feedback is also encouraging.[source][source][source]
The review, at a glance
Work@380 is a credible choice for a daytime working visit, especially if natural light, air conditioning and approachable hosts matter more than a documented networking programme. July and August 2026 guests support those strengths, while meeting-room feedback is also encouraging. Book provisionally rather than assuming every advertised benefit applies to your pass: confirm room availability, the VAT-inclusive price and arrival hours. For a month, first test your actual internet workload and chair comfort; the evidence does not establish sustained network reliability, ergonomic equipment or monthly terms.
[source][source][source]Google: 4.9/5 from 16 public ratings. Reported by the provider ↗This is the provider’s aggregate, separate from the guest reviews we analyzed and from the LodgeLens rating.
Who it suits
Who should look elsewhere
The scorecard
Each rating is supported by cited experiences or, for access, documented terms. An unrated category is an evidence gap, not a zero.
The reasons to consider it
The compromises to understand
A closer look · Chapter 1
The strongest case for spending a working day here is the physical atmosphere. An August 2026 guest describes a bright, air-conditioned workspace, and a separate July 2026 account highlights natural light and good air conditioning. Another July visitor found the space comfortable and completed an afternoon with a lunch outing and return. These are useful signs for ordinary laptop work rather than merely attractive operator descriptions. Focus evidence needs more qualification: the July 2026 account praises the working atmosphere and a fairly quiet neighbourhood, whereas the explicit report that the workspace was always calm comes from January 2025. That older experience is reassuring, not a current noise guarantee. For a month-long commitment, try a representative workday before relying on the comfort reports: none specifies chair adjustability or desk ergonomics. Friendly staff are independently praised, but that should not be mistaken for an established peer community or networking programme.
[source]A closer look · Chapter 2
Calls have better supporting evidence than internet performance. A July 2026 guest describes the meeting room as well-insulated and suitable for calls or meetings; another recommends the venue for small meetings. An August 2026 guest actually booked the room for a morning session, which helps establish practical use. The operator describes a six-person room and advertises client meetings without additional costs, but the supplied page does not explain booking limits or which passes receive that benefit. Confirm those details rather than assuming an available private room whenever a call arrives. A January 2025 review also mentions a separate open room for calls; that historical description should not be conflated with a soundproof booth or the current meeting-room layout. Internet evidence is thinner: one July 2026 visitor calls it excellent, alongside the operator's high-speed Wi-Fi claim. There are no supplied speed tests or second independent performance reports, so demanding uploads and sustained video calls deserve a trial with your own workload.
[source][source]A closer look · Chapter 3
The operator publishes a usable starting point: from €14 per day plus VAT, not a flat €14 tax-inclusive day pass. The supplied material does not establish monthly rates, final tax-inclusive charges or membership-specific meeting-room rules. A September 2024 guest considered prices fair, but that older judgment cannot validate today's package or a month-long commitment. Access is another detail worth checking directly. The operator says Monday–Friday, 09:00–18:00, while Maps lists 08:30–19:00 on weekdays and closure at weekends. Use the operator's narrower window as a planning baseline until your booking confirms otherwise. Location evidence is more consistent: a July 2026 guest praises transport accessibility, and the operator describes nearby garden and lunch options. Another July visitor went out to eat and returned without trouble during an afternoon session. That supports a practical daytime routine, but it does not establish unrestricted re-entry for every membership.
[source][source][source]Understand the pass before you pay
Published prices checked within the last 30 days. These are not live quotes or a promise of desk availability.
| Pass or plan | Published price | Conditions & source |
|---|---|---|
| Advertised starting daily rate | EUR 14 / day | From €14 per day, plus VAT. Final tax-inclusive cost, booking conditions and membership-specific room entitlement are not established.[source] |
Facilities in the evidence
A useful first-day check
Test a call from the area you would use. Check the desk, chair, power sockets and connection with your own device. Ask whether booths and meeting rooms need a reservation or cost extra.
A published facility tells you what to ask about. It does not establish measured speed, low noise, comfortable seating or spare capacity.
Read this before you go
Still to confirm
Make the whole day work
A shorter journey, a better night’s sleep or a pool at the end of the day. Match your stay to what matters.
Check the details for yourself
How this guide is built
Each review combines sourced guest experiences with operator information. We assess seven parts of the working day and explain the strengths, trade-offs and gaps. We have not visited or independently tested the spaces.
The overall rating is a weighted calculation from supported category scores. A rating needs at least four supported categories, two core work categories and five distinct cited guest reviews. A facility list or a public star rating alone is insufficient.
Unavailable categories are left unrated, and weights are redistributed across the supported categories. Each needs confidence of at least 65% and two distinct cited guest reviews; access can instead use two documented facts. Value evidence expires after 30 days; other category evidence after 90 days.
Rankings use the calculated overall rating, then evidence confidence and analyzed review count, with a stable identifier as the final tie-break. Category shortlists use category score, confidence and the same stable identifier. Hotel commissions do not enter either calculation.
AI assists the individual analysis and writing. The city ordering is calculated directly from those individual findings. Google’s reported rating remains separate from our assessment.
Know something that has changed? Send a correction →Run this workspace?
Work@380 is featured in our guide to the best coworking spaces in Lisbon: #2 of 17 reviewed spaces in Lisbon · #2 for desk comfort in Lisbon · #1 for calls & meetings in Lisbon. Members planning a working stay can use this page to find reviewed hotels nearby.
Add the badge to your website or listing. It links to this review and updates automatically with our published ranking. Spotted something out of date? Send us a correction — inclusion is editorial and never requires a link.
Find your working-day fit
A different neighbourhood, day-pass arrangement or access plan might suit your routine better. Compare the individual findings across Lisbon.