Coworking review · Medellín
Checked 9 Oct 2026NOI is a promising choice for a working day and a plausible longer-term base, especially for workers who value professional company, varied spaces and flexible hours. Recent guests support its internet and comfort, but a September 2026 noise report prevents a blanket recommendation for uninterrupted private calls.[source][source]
The review, at a glance
NOI is a promising choice for a working day and a plausible longer-term base, especially for workers who value professional company, varied spaces and flexible hours. Recent guests support its internet and comfort, but a September 2026 noise report prevents a blanket recommendation for uninterrupted private calls. Temperature feedback also conflicts. Try the actual desk and call room you would book before purchasing a month. Current rates are unknown: the supplied material contains no current operator tariff, and guest descriptions of inexpensive booking cannot establish today's price or inclusions.
[source][source]Google: 4.8/5 from 318 public ratings. Reported by the provider ↗This is the provider’s aggregate, separate from the guest reviews we analyzed and from the LodgeLens rating.
Who it suits
Who should look elsewhere
The scorecard
Each rating is supported by cited experiences or, for access, documented terms. An unrated category is an evidence gap, not a zero.
The reasons to consider it
The compromises to understand
A closer look · Chapter 1
The strongest reason to consider NOI for more than a one-off visit is evidence of sustained use: a June 2026 reviewer reports working here for over two years. September 2026 feedback specifically praises chairs for long workdays, while February 2026 feedback describes working areas both inside and outside offices. That suggests useful choice, although it does not establish which areas a particular booking includes. Quietness is less uniform: a May 2026 guest calls the atmosphere calm, but a September 2026 guest hears ambient noise in a room. Temperature deserves equal attention. July 2025 feedback describes heat, unreliable wall fans and small seating areas; October 2025 feedback praises air conditioning. These accounts may concern different spaces, but the evidence cannot resolve that. An August 2023 diesel-smell complaint is historical and is opposed by December 2025 praise for the smell and atmosphere. Do not treat it as a current air-quality finding. A trial day at the actual proposed workstation is more useful than assuming every area performs alike.
[source]A closer look · Chapter 2
Connectivity has persuasive recent support: September 2026 feedback describes fast internet for video calls and meetings, and a separate February 2026 guest calls the connection stable. These are user experiences, not measured speeds or proof of a service guarantee. An August 2023 reviewer lost stable connectivity for 20 minutes during a power outage; its age limits its relevance, and backup-power arrangements remain unknown. Call-space evidence is encouraging but mixed. An October 2025 working-day visitor says NOI met their need for private offices when making calls. An April 2024 month-long user reported plentiful call rooms without waiting, but that historical availability should not be projected onto today's occupancy. An April 2025 guest describes booths for daily rental and calls them soundproof; that wording is not verified acoustic performance or proof of inclusion in a day pass. The September 2026 room-noise report and August 2023 loud, hot pod-fan complaint justify testing privacy, fan noise and ventilation before booking a call-heavy day or month.
[source]A closer look · Chapter 3
Current rates are unknown because no current operator price source is supplied. An October 2025 day visitor found reservation easy and inexpensive, and an August 2025 guest described free coffee and herbal teas plus affordable breakfasts and lunches. Those accounts are useful signals, not a current tariff or confirmation of what every membership includes. The October 2025 visitor also reports showers, refrigerators and snack machines; verify availability and access before relying on them. Hours have stronger corroboration: the listing advertises 24-hour opening, and a September 2026 guest explicitly appreciates 24/7 access. Nevertheless, that does not establish unrestricted overnight entry for every day booking, so confirm your arrival time and access procedure. A July 2025 guest places NOI close to the subway, making it worth considering for car-free access without claiming an exact journey time. Driving is the clearer drawback: August 2025 feedback calls parking difficult, and January 2026 feedback says there is no parking. Ask about your own transport and booking requirements before committing.
[source][source]Understand the pass before you pay
Published prices checked within the last 30 days. These are not live quotes or a promise of desk availability.
Facilities in the evidence
A useful first-day check
Test a call from the area you would use. Check the desk, chair, power sockets and connection with your own device. Ask whether booths and meeting rooms need a reservation or cost extra.
A published facility tells you what to ask about. It does not establish measured speed, low noise, comfortable seating or spare capacity.
Read this before you go
Still to confirm
Make the whole day work
A shorter journey, a better night’s sleep or a pool at the end of the day. Match your stay to what matters.
Check the details for yourself
How this guide is built
Each review combines sourced guest experiences with operator information. We assess seven parts of the working day and explain the strengths, trade-offs and gaps. We have not visited or independently tested the spaces.
The overall rating is a weighted calculation from supported category scores. A rating needs at least four supported categories, two core work categories and five distinct cited guest reviews. A facility list or a public star rating alone is insufficient.
Unavailable categories are left unrated, and weights are redistributed across the supported categories. Each needs confidence of at least 65% and two distinct cited guest reviews; access can instead use two documented facts. Value evidence expires after 30 days; other category evidence after 90 days.
Rankings use the calculated overall rating, then evidence confidence and analyzed review count, with a stable identifier as the final tie-break. Category shortlists use category score, confidence and the same stable identifier. Hotel commissions do not enter either calculation.
AI assists the individual analysis and writing. The city ordering is calculated directly from those individual findings. Google’s reported rating remains separate from our assessment.
Know something that has changed? Send a correction →Run this workspace?
NOI Coworking Medellín is featured in our guide to the best coworking spaces in Medellín: #4 of 8 reviewed spaces in Medellín · #1 for connectivity in Medellín · #3 for desk comfort in Medellín · #2 for access in Medellín · #2 for community in Medellín. Members planning a working stay can use this page to find reviewed hotels nearby.
Add the badge to your website or listing. It links to this review and updates automatically with our published ranking. Spotted something out of date? Send us a correction — inclusion is editorial and never requires a link.
Find your working-day fit
A different neighbourhood, day-pass arrangement or access plan might suit your routine better. Compare the individual findings across Medellín.