Coworking review · Mexico City

Checked 9 Oct 2026

358 Grados

Consider 358 Grados for a trial day if you want a garden-oriented, creative workspace and can arrange entry beforehand. The strongest coworking accounts are historical: 2021–2023 guests describe usable, pleasant spaces, while 2018 reports praise networking and reception.[source][source]

6.0/10LodgeLens assessment
4 supported categories · 30 review excerpts analyzed

Based on guest experiences and operator information. We have not visited or independently tested the space.

At a glance

Its strongest supported categories.

See every rating ↗
Community
7.0/10Moderate evidence confidence[source]
Focus and noise
6.5/10Moderate evidence confidence[source]
Desk and chair comfort
6.0/10Moderate evidence confidence[source]

The review, at a glance

The working-day verdict.

6.0/10LodgeLens analysis
4 supported categories

Consider 358 Grados for a trial day if you want a garden-oriented, creative workspace and can arrange entry beforehand. The strongest coworking accounts are historical: 2021–2023 guests describe usable, pleasant spaces, while 2018 reports praise networking and reception. Against that, 2020 feedback calls the rooms small and improvised, and 2023–2024 reports raise entry problems. The operator still lists coworking, but its sprucing-up message does not establish a completed renovation or current availability. For a month-long commitment, first verify desk comfort, internet, call arrangements and a written price: none is adequately established by this evidence.

[source][source]
30Review excerpts analyzed
4Supported rating categories
3Source records consulted
9 Oct 2026Analysis date

30 review excerpts analyzed from 30 substantive, distinct collected reviews. All substantive, distinct review records collected were included in the analysis as excerpts. 1 review source is represented. The provider’s public rating count is separate from this sample.

Google: 4.4/5 from 104 public ratings. Reported by the provider ↗This is the provider’s aggregate, separate from the guest reviews we analyzed and from the LodgeLens rating.

Who it suits

A good fit when…

  • Creative workers interested in a venue with a garden, recording facilities and an arts-oriented setting, subject to confirming which facilities they can book.[source][source]
  • Workers willing to test the space before committing, attracted by historical reports of friendly hosts and networking rather than guaranteed current community programming.[source]

Who should look elsewhere

Less suitable when…

  • Anyone needing dependable walk-in entry for a time-critical working day should look elsewhere unless the venue confirms a reliable arrival arrangement; 2023–2024 reports describe door problems.[source]
  • Workers requiring proven ergonomic desks or guaranteed private video-call facilities should not commit on the strength of general comfort and recording-studio descriptions alone.[source]

The scorecard

Seven parts of a good working day.

Each rating is supported by cited experiences or, for access, documented terms. An unrated category is an evidence gap, not a zero.

Focus and noise

6.5/10

Two guests describe quiet or peaceful working conditions, but those reports date to 2018–2019. The 2025 arts-event account does not establish present-day desk noise or a quiet-work policy.[source]

Moderate evidence confidence · 3 cited guest reviews

Internet and connectivity

Unrated

The 2023 workspace account and 2021 coworking account establish working use, not internet performance. Neither reports Wi-Fi reliability, upload capacity or successful online meetings, so connectivity remains unscored.[source]

Insufficient current evidence for a rating

Desk and chair comfort

6.0/10

A 2023 guest praises spacious work areas and a 2021 guest reports comfort, especially in the studio. A 2020 guest instead describes small, improvised spaces; chair ergonomics remain undocumented.[source]

Moderate evidence confidence · 3 cited guest reviews

Calls and meetings

Unrated

Recording facilities appear in separate 2021 and 2022 guest accounts, but neither establishes video-call suitability, acoustic privacy, phone booths or included studio access. Call performance cannot responsibly be scored.[source]

Insufficient current evidence for a rating

Value for money

Unrated

A 2018 reviewer calls prices affordable, while a 2020 reviewer balances good service against improvised rooms. Without current operator rates, durations or inclusions, neither establishes today's value.[source][source]

Insufficient current evidence for a rating

Location and access

4.5/10

The address and listed weekday hours are documented, but 2023–2024 guests report unanswered or slow entry. These historical warnings justify caution, not a conclusion that the branch is currently closed.[source][source]

Moderate evidence confidence · 2 cited guest reviews

Community

7.0/10

Separate 2018 guests describe networking and an immediately welcoming reception, reinforced by attentive-staff feedback in 2020. The 2025 arts-event account supports a creative setting, not a verified current coworker community.[source]

Moderate evidence confidence · 4 cited guest reviews

The reasons to consider it

What works well.

  • A garden and multiple working spaces are supported by both operator information and historical guest accounts.[source][source]
  • Several historical guests praise attentive service, welcoming staff and opportunities to meet other workers.[source]
  • A 2023 guest describes pleasant work areas, spaciousness and good service.[source]

The compromises to understand

What could get in your way.

  • Entry reliability is questionable on historical evidence: a 2023 reviewer received no response, and a 2024 guest reported lengthy waits.[source]
  • Space assessments conflict: a 2020 reviewer found rooms small and improvised, unlike the spaciousness reported in 2023.[source]
  • Current rates are unknown: the supplied operator page has no price schedule, and the affordability comment dates to 2018.[source][source]

A closer look · Chapter 1

A garden-led working day, with mixed room reports

The appeal is a less corporate working environment: the operator lists a multipurpose garden, while 2021–2022 guests describe several spaces, coworking areas and recording facilities. A 2020 guest also praises brightness and attentive staff. These accounts make the garden and atmosphere meaningful reasons to investigate, rather than relying on the venue's coworking label alone. Space quality is less settled. A 2023 worker found the areas spacious and pleasant, whereas a 2020 reviewer called them small and somewhat improvised; another 2019 visitor also described a very small venue. Different rooms or changing arrangements could explain this, but the evidence does not resolve it. Quietness rests on 2018–2019 reports, not recent desk observations. The 2025 description of art performances establishes other uses of the house without proving disruptive noise. Before booking a month, ask to see the actual desk offered and confirm whether events affect that working area.

[source][source]

A closer look · Chapter 2

Recording facilities are not a video-call guarantee

A recording studio is a distinctive feature, but it should not be treated as evidence of an included private call room. The operator lists it, a 2022 guest mentions it alongside coworking spaces, and a 2021 guest particularly liked the studio for recording photos and commercial audio. None of those accounts specifies booking rules, acoustic separation, availability to desk users or suitability for routine video meetings. Likewise, the 2021 and 2023 reports of working here contain no connection measurements or descriptions of reliable online calls. General praise for amenities cannot fill that gap. If your day depends on screen sharing, uploads or confidential conversations, request a connection trial at the intended desk and an explicit explanation of where calls are allowed. For audio-oriented creative work, ask for studio terms separately. The evidence supports investigating that facility, not assuming specialist equipment or private space comes with a coworking booking.

[source][source]

A closer look · Chapter 3

Confirm the booking and the door before travelling

Current rates are unknown: the supplied operator page lists services but no prices, and the only explicit affordability endorsement dates to 2018. It cannot establish a present-day day rate, monthly cost, tax treatment or included facilities. Obtain a written quote identifying the workspace, duration and any separate office or studio charges. The listing places the branch at La Quemada 358 in Narvarte Poniente and shows Monday–Friday hours of 9 AM–8 PM, with weekends closed; those are listing hours, not proof of membership-specific access. Arrival deserves particular attention. A 2023 reviewer reported a disconnected phone and an unanswered doorbell. A positive 2024 reviewer nevertheless said opening took ages and visitors sometimes handled the door for others. These accounts do not prove closure, but they undermine confidence in an unarranged walk-in. The operator's sprucing-up message supplies no completion date. Confirm that coworking desks are available and agree on an arrival contact before making the trip.

[source][source][source]

Understand the pass before you pay

Prices and access at 358 Grados.

Published prices checked within the last 30 days. These are not live quotes or a promise of desk availability.

We do not have a sufficiently recent, sourced price for this space. Ask the operator for a written quote including tax, hours and the facilities you need.

A day pass and a full-time membership can have different opening hours. Twenty-four-hour member access does not mean overnight access is included in a day pass.

Facilities in the evidence

Facilities for your workday.

Multipurpose garden; operator-listed and reported by guests in 2021–2022
Reported in the source evidence[source][source]
Private offices listed by operator; availability and booking terms unverified
Listed by the operator[source]
Recording studio; operator-listed and described by guests in 2021–2022, inclusion unknown
Reported in the source evidence[source][source]

A useful first-day check

Try your real work setup.

Test a call from the area you would use. Check the desk, chair, power sockets and connection with your own device. Ask whether booths and meeting rooms need a reservation or cost extra.

A published facility tells you what to ask about. It does not establish measured speed, low noise, comfortable seating or spare capacity.

Read this before you go

The conditions that could change your choice.

  • Entry reliability is questionable on historical evidence: a 2023 reviewer received no response, and a 2024 guest reported lengthy waits.[source]
  • Space assessments conflict: a 2020 reviewer found rooms small and improvised, unlike the spaciousness reported in 2023.[source]
  • Current rates are unknown: the supplied operator page has no price schedule, and the affordability comment dates to 2018.[source][source]

Still to confirm

Leave room for the unknowns.

  • Current pass and membership prices need confirmation with the operator.
  • Internet performance and noise during your actual working hours.
  • Seat availability and the total price for your chosen date.
Ask through the official website ↗

Make the whole day work

Hotels near 358 Grados.

A shorter journey, a better night’s sleep or a pool at the end of the day. Match your stay to what matters.

Within 5 km in a straight line, not walking distance. Sorted by the selected category score, then distance. Only hotels with a score of at least 7/10 and enough supporting evidence qualify. Hotel links may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you; commission does not affect this selection.[source]

No analyzed hotel within 5 km currently has enough supporting evidence for this priority. Try closest stays or another priority.
Show closest analyzed stays →

Check the details for yourself

Sources and freshness.

  1. 358 Grados — collected Google review sample ↗review platform · Checked 9 Oct 2026
  2. 358 Grados — Google Maps listing ↗Map provider · Checked 9 Oct 2026
  3. 358° Coworking Space ↗Official operator website · Checked 9 Oct 2026
See the individual sourced claims
  • The operator lists coworking, private offices, a multipurpose garden and a recording studio.[source]
  • The operator identifies its Narvarte address and displays a sprucing-up message without a completion date.[source]
  • The listing supplies the exact branch address.[source]
  • The listing supplies the candidate coordinates.[source]
  • A 2022 guest described a garden, rooms, coworking spaces and a recording studio.[source]

    Review posted

  • A 2021 guest described coworking alongside a garden and a dubbing school.[source]

    Review posted

  • A 2023 guest found the working areas spacious and the service good.[source]

    Review posted

  • A 2020 guest found the spaces small and somewhat improvised, despite good service.[source]

    Review posted

  • A 2023 reviewer reported a disconnected phone and no response at the door.[source]

    Review posted

  • A 2024 guest liked the venue but reported slow door opening and handling other visitors' entry.[source]

    Review posted

  • A 2019 guest described a quiet, friendly working space.[source]

    Review posted

  • A 2018 guest described peaceful working conditions.[source]

    Review posted

  • A 2021 guest found the workspace comfortable, particularly its recording studio.[source]

    Review posted

  • A 2020 guest praised brightness, the garden and attentive staff.[source]

    Review posted

  • A 2025 visitor described the house as hosting art events and performances.[source]

    Review posted

  • A 2018 guest reported networking opportunities and well-organized events.[source]

    Review posted

  • A 2018 coworking guest reported an immediately welcoming reception.[source]

    Review posted

  • A 2018 reviewer described prices as very affordable without specifying amounts or terms.[source]

    Review posted

  • The listing shows weekday hours of 9 AM–8 PM and weekend closure.[source]
  • A 2019 guest described the venue as small and difficult to access.[source]

    Review posted

Facility evidence is treated as current for up to 90 days; price evidence is shown for up to 30 days. After that, a new source check is needed. A rebuild does not reset a source’s check date.

How this guide is built

Individual findings drive the rankings.

Each review combines sourced guest experiences with operator information. We assess seven parts of the working day and explain the strengths, trade-offs and gaps. We have not visited or independently tested the spaces.

The overall rating is a weighted calculation from supported category scores. A rating needs at least four supported categories, two core work categories and five distinct cited guest reviews. A facility list or a public star rating alone is insufficient.

See the score weights and evidence rules
  • Focused work: 20%
  • Connectivity: 25%
  • Desk comfort: 15%
  • Calls & meetings: 15%
  • Value: 10%
  • Access: 10%
  • Community: 5%

Unavailable categories are left unrated, and weights are redistributed across the supported categories. Each needs confidence of at least 65% and two distinct cited guest reviews; access can instead use two documented facts. Value evidence expires after 30 days; other category evidence after 90 days.

Rankings use the calculated overall rating, then evidence confidence and analyzed review count, with a stable identifier as the final tie-break. Category shortlists use category score, confidence and the same stable identifier. Hotel commissions do not enter either calculation.

AI assists the individual analysis and writing. The city ordering is calculated directly from those individual findings. Google’s reported rating remains separate from our assessment.

Know something that has changed? Send a correction →

Find your working-day fit

One city. More ways to work.

A different neighbourhood, day-pass arrangement or access plan might suit your routine better. Compare the individual findings across Mexico City.

Explore the Mexico City guide →