Standard King Room - Non-Smoking
Why consider it
No room-specific strengths established.
Check before paying
Confirm current condition, exact layout and inclusions.
Mexico City / The stay, beyond the listing
F.C. Interoceánico 9, Colonia Morelos
The LodgeLens take
Check the wi-fi findings before booking
A practical but inconsistent option: spacious rooms, breakfast, transport access, a basic gym and friendly service are balanced by poor sound insulation, uncertain cooling, maintenance concerns, weak Wi-Fi and mixed surroundings.
Worth checking: 52 of the 659 reviews in our sample contain a complaint about noise. See the evidence
Published property photos · may not show current condition
Seen from USD 63 a night on sample dates
Strongest: Gym 7.0, Breakfast and dining 6.8, Price and value 6.5
Weakest: Wi-Fi 3.0, Sleep and noise 4.5, Cleanliness and condition 5.0
If it sounds right
We observed USD 63–91 a night on sample dates. Live prices move with the calendar.
We may earn a commission if you book through these links. Commission does not affect our analysis or scores.
Compare the same room, dates and guest count. Check taxes, breakfast and cancellation terms before paying.
Choose the room, not just the hotel
Compare the room labels attached to guest reviews. Samples vary; a higher stay rating alone does not prove a better room. Check the exact bed, layout and inclusions before paying.
No room-specific strengths established.
Confirm current condition, exact layout and inclusions.
No room-specific strengths established.
Confirm current condition, exact layout and inclusions.
No room-specific strengths established.
Confirm current condition, exact layout and inclusions.
No room-specific strengths established.
Confirm current condition, exact layout and inclusions.
No room-specific strengths established.
Confirm current condition, exact layout and inclusions.
No room-specific strengths established.
Confirm current condition, exact layout and inclusions.
Make the room request specific
Select a room above, then copy an enquiry to use before booking. Nothing is sent from this page.
No room selected. The enquiry will ask about the hotel generally.
A closer look, on your terms
Choose a priority to focus the review. Scores are our AI-assisted evidence assessments out of 10, separate from hotel stars and provider ratings.
11 topics · open any evidence panel for guest quotes, photos and how the score was formed.
Will you actually sleep here?
118 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026.
Sleep is a gamble: the beds can be comfortable, but noise is the main weakness.
Check before bookingSupplied reviews document street, hallway, neighboring-room, and construction noise.
Sleep is a gamble: the beds can be comfortable, but noise is the main weakness. Guests report street, hallway, neighboring-room and construction noise, with thin walls and poorly insulated windows. Light sleepers should look elsewhere or request a quiet room.
Guests reporting this gave the whole stay 7/10 on average.
Those who complained rated the whole stay 6.25/10 on average.
Nice firm beds
floor drain running noise continuously
There was construction in front of the hotel
Sleep quality is constrained by documented noise and inconsistent bedding feedback. Comfortable beds and some quiet stays prevent a very low score, but street, hallway, neighboring-room, and construction noise materially reduce reliability.
Evidence confidence: higher. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.
What are the rooms actually like?
128 reviews about this · 48 photos available · analyzed Oct 2026.
The rooms are reasonably spacious but uneven in quality. Guests praise the size, while stiff beds and bathroom problems—especially slippery, flooding showers—drag them down. They suit travelers who value space over polished finishes.






Rooms were big and spacious
Nice firm beds
Beds were stiff
Shower was very dangerous- tile and water flooded out so were we using many towels
Is it clean and well kept?
190 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026.
Guests rate this 8.4; our evidence assessment is 5.0. These use different methods and samples; the detail below explains our assessment.
Cleanliness is inconsistent, and the hotel feels more worn than its provider score suggests.
Check before bookingSupplied reviews document dirty rooms, worn linens, odors, old furnishings, damaged fittings, and plumbing problems.
Cleanliness is inconsistent, and the hotel feels more worn than its provider score suggests. Guests often find rooms clean, but reports also mention odors, worn towels, damaged fittings, unreliable hot water and plumbing issues. Check your room promptly if condition matters to you.
Those who complained rated the whole stay 5.88/10 on average.
Guests reporting this gave the whole stay 6.64/10 on average.
Guests reporting this gave the whole stay 7.5/10 on average.
It was clean
Dirty and freezing room
and the towels were worn and had holes
5/10. Overall condition is ordinary-to-limited: cleanliness has substantial positive evidence but also documented serious failures, while room maintenance and datedness are weakened by broken fittings, worn textiles, odors, old bathrooms, and aged furnishings. Evidence does not establish a deterioration trend.
Evidence confidence: higher. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.
Do the staff fix things when they go wrong?
137 reviews about this · 3 photos available · analyzed Oct 2026.
Guests rate this 9.3; our evidence assessment is 6.0. These use different methods and samples; the detail below explains our assessment.
Staff are generally friendly, but they do not always solve problems effectively. Guests often praise helpful service and straightforward check-in, while some describe indifferent front-desk interactions. It is fine for routine stays, less reassuring when something goes wrong.



The staff was helpful and friendly
Front desk staff was blah - felt like we were bothering them
Is breakfast worth booking?
233 reviews about this · 9 photos available · analyzed Oct 2026.
Breakfast is a decent convenience rather than a standout reason to book.
Check before bookingSome guests describe breakfast as basic, limited, mediocre, or needing more variety.
Breakfast is a decent convenience rather than a standout reason to book. Guests commonly like the buffet, variety, coffee and included option, but others find it basic, with shortages, crowding and uneven service at busy times. Book it if convenience matters more than a refined meal.



Breakfast was very good
There was free coffee
Would pay more for a more classy room Breakfast is just OK
Evidence confidence: moderate. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.
Is the pool as good as the photos?
6 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026.
Guests rate this 8.8; our evidence assessment is 5.0. These use different methods and samples; the detail below explains our assessment.
The pool is underwhelming based on the mixed evidence, despite some praise.
Check before bookingThe stored-corpus pool mentions are predominantly complaints, though the supplied excerpts do not specify the complaint details.
The pool is underwhelming based on the mixed evidence, despite some praise. Pool-related feedback leans negative, and there is not enough detail to confirm that it matches promotional expectations. Treat it as a bonus, not a deciding feature.
5/10. The pool exists and received one explicit positive mention, but corpus statistics record five complaints against one praise. The supplied excerpts do not establish the specific nature of those complaints, so this is a cautious, medium-low assessment rather than a finding about a particular defect.
Evidence confidence: moderate. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.
How well placed is it, really?
96 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026.
Guests rate this 8.0; our evidence assessment is 5.8. These use different methods and samples; the detail below explains our assessment.
The location is practical but not especially comfortable for everyone.
Check before bookingSeveral supplied reviews describe the immediate area as unsafe, unpleasant or uncomfortable at night.
The location is practical but not especially comfortable for everyone. Public transport, shops and everyday services are close, yet guests report feeling unsafe or uneasy walking nearby at night, and the historic centre is not especially close. It works best for travelers using transit or ride-hailing rather than walking everywhere.
Good location for walking & exploring
we found them safe in daytime Parking lot
It is not really safe to walk from the hotel
you have to take an Uber
Overall location is practical for airport and bus-terminal trips and has strong nearby transit and everyday services. It is held back by repeated independent safety and surroundings concerns, mixed taxi convenience, and mixed tourist-centre access. The score is an editorial assessment, not a citywide ranking.
Evidence confidence: moderate. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.
Can you work or take calls from the room?
36 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026.
Wi-Fi is a poor choice for dependable work or calls.
Check before bookingSupplied reviews report unreliable, weak, or nonfunctional Wi-Fi, including a recent complaint.
Wi-Fi is a poor choice for dependable work or calls. Guests report weak, unreliable or nonfunctional service, and no speed evidence supports relying on it. Casual browsing may be fine, but remote workers should bring a backup connection.
Wi-Fi doesn't work properly
Evidence confidence: moderate. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.
Is the desk usable for a working day?
39 reviews about this · 3 photos available · analyzed Oct 2026.
There is a usable-looking workspace, but room work setups are not consistently practical.
Check before bookingSupplied reviews report missing or inconvenient power outlets and, in one case, no chairs at the table.
There is a usable-looking workspace, but room work setups are not consistently practical. A shared office has desks, chairs and computers, while guests report inconvenient power outlets and occasional lack of chairs. It suits light tasks better than a full working day.



Wi-Fi doesn't work properly
Workspace provision is clearly present: supplied images show a dedicated office and room desks. However, guest evidence documents outlet limitations and insufficient seating, so this is useful but not fully reliable for sustained work. The score is based on supplied examples, not prevalence.
Evidence confidence: moderate. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.
Is there anywhere to train?
6 reviews about this · 2 photos available · analyzed Oct 2026.
Guests rate this 8.8; our evidence assessment is 7.0. These use different methods and samples; the detail below explains our assessment.
The gym is good enough for a basic workout but not serious training.
Check before bookingOne supplied review describes the gym as limited to a treadmill and dumbbells and requests a multifunction machine.
The gym is good enough for a basic workout but not serious training. It has cardio equipment, dumbbells, a bench and a punching bag, though some guests describe the setup as limited. Bring modest expectations if fitness is important.


A documented fitness center has a useful but compact equipment mix, with positive comments from two supplied reviews. The score is moderated by a supplied description of limited equipment and the absence of verified capacity, operating conditions or serious-training equipment.
Evidence confidence: higher. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.
Is it worth the money?
24 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026.
Guests rate this 8.6; our evidence assessment is 6.5. These use different methods and samples; the detail below explains our assessment.
Value is mixed rather than compelling. Some guests call it good value, but others find it too expensive for the area, especially when the food and room condition disappoint. It makes more sense when the rate is competitive and you prioritize practical access over polish.
Great value for money
Too pricey for the area and the food was ok
Patterns in the reviews we analyzed
Patterns from 659 analyzed reviews. Use them to ask better questions: review counts are not a prediction of your stay, and text interpretation can miss nuance.
52 of 659 reviews contain a complaint about this.
52 of 67 classified opinions about this were negative — 78% of these opinions. 52 of those are from the last 730 days. 70 of 659 reviews mention it at all.
floor drain running noise continuously
17 of 659 reviews contain a complaint about this.
17 of 19 classified opinions about this were negative — 89% of these opinions. 17 of those are from the last 730 days. 19 of 659 reviews mention it at all.
Hot water is not reliable
bathroom sink not draining at all
14 of 659 reviews contain a complaint about this.
14 of 15 classified opinions about this were negative — 93% of these opinions. 14 of those are from the last 730 days. 15 of 659 reviews mention it at all.
14 of 659 reviews contain a complaint about this.
14 of 15 classified opinions about this were negative — 93% of these opinions. 14 of those are from the last 730 days. 16 of 659 reviews mention it at all.
4 of 659 reviews contain a complaint about this.
4 of 5 classified opinions about this were negative — 80% of these opinions. 4 of those are from the last 730 days. 5 of 659 reviews mention it at all.
The noise from the street is disruptive to say the least
Reasons guests were glad they booked
153 reviewers praised it, 33 complained · 82% of opinions positive
Breakfast was very good
120 reviewers praised it, 36 complained · 77% of opinions positive
It was clean
92 reviewers praised it, 31 complained · 75% of opinions positive
The staff was helpful and friendly
37 reviewers praised it, 8 complained · 82% of opinions positive
There was free coffee
28 reviewers praised it, 10 complained · 74% of opinions positive
Get a feel for the neighbourhood
11 mapped places sit within a five-minute walk. Distances are straight-line, converted to walking time at 80 m per minute with a 25% detour allowance.
We have no confirmed rail or metro station in this map sample. Check the public-transport places below and verify the route to your destinations.
Turn the findings into a better stay
Reviews and photos describe other people’s stays. The terms and room assigned to your reservation matter just as much.
Observations for specific dates, not a quote
These are historical observations, not live availability. Room types, occupancy, taxes and cancellation rules may differ between samples. Check the final total with the provider.
USD 63–91per night on sampled dates · historical observations
Good value when: Likely strongest at the observed January rate, or when the stay prioritizes basic accommodation, breakfast and airport access over upgraded rooms or amenities.
Poor value when: Riskier at the higher October and December rates, especially for guests expecting air conditioning, modern rooms, quiet, or consistently included services.
Short answers
70 of 659 reviews mention noise. Of the 70 reviewers mentioning it, 52 described a problem and 15 described it positively. These are counts of the collected reviews, not all guests. Separately, 3 reviews mention construction or roadworks nearby, 3 of them in the last two years, most recently 2026-06-24.
Jump to the detail11 mapped places sit within a five-minute walk. No rail or metro station was identified in the mapped data. Check public transport and practical routes before booking. 3 reviewers praise how much is walkable from the door.
Jump to the detail192 reviews mention breakfast. 153 described it positively and 33 described a problem.
Jump to the detailOnly 36 of 659 reviews mention it at all, 33 of them as a complaint — thin evidence either way, which is itself worth knowing if you need to work.
Jump to the detailIt scores 5.0/10 here. 6 reviews mention the pool, 5 of them as a complaint. 5/10. The pool exists and received one explicit positive mention, but corpus statistics record five complaints against one praise. The supplied excerpts do not establish the specific nature of those complaints, so this is a cautious, medium-low assessment rather than a finding about a particular defect.
Jump to the detailRates we observed for the listed sample dates ran USD 63 to USD 91 a night, with a midpoint around USD 88. Prices move with dates and room type.
Jump to the detailLight sleepers; Guests requiring reliable air conditioning or quiet rooms; Remote workers needing dependable Wi-Fi and convenient power outlets; Travellers seeking consistently modern rooms or reassuring nightlife surroundings.
Jump to the detailWorking while you stay
Reviewed coworking spaces and work-friendly cafés within 3 km in a straight line. Check the actual journey, opening hours and any day-pass or laptop rules before you go.
Coworking space · 2.8 km away · LodgeLens rating 7.4/10
Juárez 20 is worth considering for an ordinary working day if you prioritize a landmark view, a friendly atmosphere and guest-perceived affordability over a premium fit-out.
Read the review →Compare what matters to your stay
These comparisons use hotels in our analyzed collection. Follow a hotel’s review to check its trade-offs and source coverage.
Wi-Fi scores 7.5/10 in our analysis, compared with 3.0/10 here.
Wi-Fi: 7.5/10 · 8 reviews about this
Trade-off: Light sleepers requiring reliably quiet rooms
Read the supporting evidence →Wi-Fi scores 7.0/10 in our analysis, compared with 3.0/10 here.
Wi-Fi: 7.0/10 · 10 reviews about this
Trade-off: Light sleepers or travelers requiring dependable soundproofing.
Read the supporting evidence →Location and getting around scores 8.5/10 in our analysis, compared with 5.8/10 here.
Location and getting around: 8.5/10 · 65 reviews about this
Trade-off: Light sleepers or travelers highly sensitive to traffic and internal noise
Read the supporting evidence →Next step
LodgeLens ranks properties against what you personally need — quiet, a real desk, a pool worth using, a specific budget — instead of a single average score. Tell us what matters and we will send a shortlist for your dates.
Build my shortlist
Ready to book this one?
We may earn a commission if you book through these links.
What supports this review
659 reviews analyzed across 8 languages. Latest guest review: October 2026. 654 reviews from the last 12 months. Analysis: October 2026. How our analysis works
Sample dates: Feb 2025–Oct 2026. Average stay rating 8.2/10, normalized across sources. The latest 12 months average -0.0 points versus the full sample; changing guests and sources can affect this.
Our sample is not every review or every stay. Missing evidence does not establish that a facility is absent or a problem is resolved.