Lisbon / The stay, beyond the listing

Jardim da Lapa by Shiadu

52A Rua Sacramento à Lapa

The LodgeLens take

Check the wi-fi findings before booking

A pleasant, service-oriented hotel with strong breakfast and a relaxing pool, but room allocation, sound insulation, maintenance and Wi-Fi are meaningful uncertainties. Its residential location suits a quieter stay, though major attractions may require transport.

Worth checking: 38 of the 598 reviews in our sample contain a complaint about noise. See the evidence

Published property photos · may not show current condition

Published photos, not an inspection. Confirm the exact room and current facilities.

1 / 30
Use the arrow keys to browse

Seen from USD 117 a night on sample dates

Useful findings, with limits Review dates and source coverage affect how much weight to give these findings.See coverage & dates ↗

Who it may suit

  • Travelers prioritizing friendly service, a substantial breakfast and a landscaped pool over central sightseeing access.
  • Guests who enjoy a quiet residential neighborhood and can tolerate some room-to-room or aircraft noise.
  • Leisure travelers booking at the lower observed rates.

Strongest: Breakfast and dining 8.2, Staff and service 8.0, Pool 7.0

Think twice if

  • Noise-sensitive sleepers.
  • Guests requiring dependable room Wi-Fi or video calls.
  • Travelers needing a gym or a lap-swimming pool.
  • Guests unwilling to risk room-size, light or maintenance variation.

Weakest: Wi-Fi 4.0, Working from the room 5.5, Sleep and noise 6.0

If it sounds right

Check your dates

We observed USD 117–234 a night on sample dates. Live prices move with the calendar.

We may earn a commission if you book through these links. Commission does not affect our analysis or scores.

Compare the same room, dates and guest count. Check taxes, breakfast and cancellation terms before paying.

Choose the room, not just the hotel

A little care here can change your stay.

Compare the room labels attached to guest reviews. Samples vary; a higher stay rating alone does not prove a better room. Check the exact bed, layout and inclusions before paying.

Most reviewed room300 reviews

Double Room

Double bed

9.1 /10Average stay rating
34 / 300Reviews raising noise

Why consider it

Several supplied images show desks, chairs, large beds and windows.

Check before paying

Room size varies; multiple supplied reviews describe rooms as small.

More room notes

More reasons to consider it

  • Bathrooms visibly include enclosed showers and contemporary fittings.

More to check

  • Some guests report limited natural light, poor sound insulation, maintenance issues and discrepancies between photographs and assigned rooms.
Room option247 reviews

Superior Double or Twin Room

Double bed · Twin beds

9.1 /10Average stay rating
18 / 247Reviews raising noise

Why consider it

Supplied photographs show multiple room layouts, desks, armchairs, large beds and windows.

Check before paying

The supplied evidence shows meaningful variation between rooms, including dark rooms, low ceilings, small rooms and limited views.

More room notes

More reasons to consider it

  • Some supplied guests describe rooms as spacious, clean, comfortable and well appointed.

More to check

  • Bed comfort is mixed, including reports of uncomfortable, very firm and joined twin mattresses.
Room option46 reviews

Triple Room

9.3 /10Average stay rating
1 / 46Reviews raising noise

Why consider it

No room-specific strengths established.

Check before paying

Confirm current condition, exact layout and inclusions.

Make the room request specific

A useful note for the hotel

Select a room above, then copy an enquiry to use before booking. Nothing is sent from this page.

Preview the enquiry

No room selected. The enquiry will ask about the hotel generally.

A closer look, on your terms

What matters for your stay?

Choose a priority to focus the review. Scores are our AI-assisted evidence assessments out of 10, separate from hotel stars and provider ratings.

11 topics · open any evidence panel for guest quotes, photos and how the score was formed.

Will you actually sleep here?

Sleep and noise

6.0/10

183 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026.

Sleep is mixed: the residential setting can be peaceful, but soundproofing is the main weakness.

Check before bookingSound transfer between rooms, hallways and floors is documented.

Guest evidence & score details

Sleep is mixed: the residential setting can be peaceful, but soundproofing is the main weakness. Guests describe comfortable, quiet rooms, while others hear hallways, neighbouring rooms, floors or aircraft; beds also range from comfortable to too firm. Light sleepers should request a quiet room and pack earplugs.

  • Bed comfortguest review evidence
    6.5
  • Soundproofingguest review evidence
    4.5
Noise142 reviews
38 disliked101 likedlast mentioned Oct 2026
Beds and pillows38 reviews
13 disliked25 likedlast mentioned Oct 2026
Soundproofing between rooms3%
raised by 20 of 598last Sept 2026

Guests reporting this gave the whole stay 7.67/10 on average.

Construction and roadworksunder 1%
raised by 3 of 598last May 2026

Guests reporting this gave the whole stay 7.67/10 on average.

What guests liked

The room was very quiet and nice with art on the walls

Booking.com · rated 10/10 · February 2026 · Double Room

Comfortable bed with great pillows

Booking.com · rated 10/10 · December 2025 · Superior Double or Twin Room

What guests complained about

Only one problem: the noise in the hallway almost all night from other guests entering and exiting or talking in the hall

Booking.com · rated 8/10 · February 2025 · Double Room

Air conditioning made some noise

Booking.com · rated 9/10 · September 2025 · Superior Double or Twin Room
How we got to 6.0

Overall sleep prospects are mixed. The quiet residential setting and many positive quiet-room reports support sleep, but documented sound-transfer problems and aircraft noise are meaningful limitations. Bed comfort is also inconsistent. This is an editorial assessment, not a prevalence estimate.

Supports the score
  • The surrounding area is repeatedly described as quiet and residential.
  • Several guests describe the hotel or room as peaceful and comfortable.
Pulls the score down
  • Sound transfer between rooms, hallways and floors is documented.
  • Aircraft noise is a material risk for noise-sensitive sleepers.
  • Bed comfort is mixed, including reports of firm or uncomfortable beds.

Evidence confidence: moderate. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.

What are the rooms actually like?

Rooms

6.5/10

99 reviews about this · 50 photos available · analyzed Oct 2026. Limited evidence: treat this assessment as provisional.

The rooms are generally attractive and reasonably spacious, but quality is inconsistent. Comfortable beds, good pillows, views and room size earn praise, while bathrooms attract complaints about dirt and condition. Check recent room details if a well-kept bathroom matters to you.

Guest evidence & score details
Bathrooms39 reviews
21 disliked18 likedlast mentioned Sept 2026
Beds and pillows38 reviews
13 disliked25 likedlast mentioned Oct 2026
Room size22 reviews
1 disliked21 likedlast mentioned Sept 2026
Views9 reviews
2 disliked7 likedlast mentioned May 2026

What guests liked

spacious rooms

Booking.com · rated 10/10 · February 2026 · Superior Double or Twin Room

Comfortable bed with great pillows

Booking.com · rated 10/10 · December 2025 · Superior Double or Twin Room

What guests complained about

The bed in my room was not very comfortable

Booking.com · rated 8/10 · January 2026 · Superior Double or Twin Room

The room I moved into had a very dirty bathroom

Booking.com · rated 5/10 · July 2025 · Double Room

Is it clean and well kept?

Cleanliness and condition

6.5/10
9.4Agoda · 27 ratings

95 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026.

Guests rate this 9.4 (city average 8.1); our evidence assessment is 6.5. These use different methods and samples; the detail below explains our assessment.

Cleanliness is usually good, but the hotel’s upkeep is uneven enough to lower confidence.

Check before bookingSupplied reviews document isolated but serious mold, dirt, odor, and broken-fixture issues.

Guest evidence & score details

Cleanliness is usually good, but the hotel’s upkeep is uneven enough to lower confidence. Many guests find it spotlessly clean and well presented, yet some report mould, sewage smells, dirt and broken fittings. It suits travellers comfortable with a charming property that may show wear, rather than those expecting flawless maintenance.

  • Cleanlinessguest review evidence
    8.0
  • Room upkeepguest review evidence
    5.5
  • Common areasphotos and reviews
    7.0
  • Feels currentfrom the photos
    6.0
Cleanliness87 reviews
4 disliked83 likedlast mentioned Oct 2026
Smells and damp1%
raised by 8 of 598last May 2026

Guests reporting this gave the whole stay 6.86/10 on average.

Wear and maintenanceunder 1%
raised by 3 of 598last Sept 2025

Those who complained rated the whole stay 4/10 on average.

What guests liked

Everywhere was spotlessly clean and the staff were professional and friendly

Booking.com · rated 10/10 · October 2026 · Superior Double or Twin Room

What guests complained about

The room I moved into had a very dirty bathroom

Booking.com · rated 5/10 · July 2025 · Double Room

the showerhead was broken and dirty and there was black mould all over the shower

Booking.com · rated 5/10 · July 2025 · Double Room
How we got to 6.5

6.5/10. Overall condition is mixed: cleanliness is usually praised, while maintenance and damp-related complaints are materially negative. The corpus detects 3 wear complaints and 8 smells-and-damp mentions, including 7 complaints; the latest detected damp/odor complaint is within the current 180-day window. The supplied evidence does not establish a reliable deterioration trend.

Supports the score
  • Cleanliness is praised in many supplied reviews, including recent stays.
  • Rooms are visibly furnished and generally well presented in supplied photographs.
  • Daily housekeeping is listed by the provider.
Pulls the score down
  • Supplied reviews document isolated but serious mold, dirt, odor, and broken-fixture issues.
  • Maintenance complaints include worn finishes, broken shower fittings, and poor upkeep.
  • Photographs are marketing images and cannot establish actual cleanliness or wear.

Evidence confidence: moderate. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.

Do the staff fix things when they go wrong?

Staff and service

8.0/10
9.7Agoda · 27 ratings

325 reviews about this · 1 photos available · analyzed Oct 2026.

Guests rate this 9.7 (city average 8.0); our evidence assessment is 8.0. These use different methods and samples; the detail below explains our assessment.

Staff are a clear strength and usually friendly, helpful and responsive. Guests praise the welcome, pre-arrival communication and everyday service, though isolated experiences mention inflexible check-in or less polished professionalism. Choose this hotel if personal service matters more to you than perfectly consistent execution.

Guest evidence & score details
  • Friendlinessguest review evidence
    8.5
  • Responsivenessguest review evidence
    8.0
  • Check-inguest review evidence
    7.0
  • Problem solvingguest review evidence
    6.5
Staff and service319 reviews
17 disliked302 likedlast mentioned Oct 2026
Check-in and check-out17 reviews
5 disliked12 likedlast mentioned Jul 2026
Housekeeping3 reviews
1 disliked2 likedlast mentioned Mar 2026

What guests liked

It is a wonderful relaxing small hotel with very friendly helpful staff

Booking.com · rated 8/10 · June 2026 · Superior Double or Twin Room

Perfect with an efficient pre arrival brief and check in and a big welcome

Booking.com · rated 10/10 · April 2026 · Superior Double or Twin Room

What guests complained about

It had the feeling they were interns more than trained hospitality staff

Booking.com · rated 7/10 · October 2026 · Superior Double or Twin Room

looked at her watch and judged by the time that I was not allowed to check in rather than by room availability

Booking.com · rated 4/10 · February 2026 · Superior Double or Twin Room

Is breakfast worth booking?

Breakfast and dining

8.2/10

296 reviews about this · 12 photos available · analyzed Oct 2026.

Yes, breakfast is generally worth booking.

Check before bookingSome supplied reviews describe breakfast as limited, repetitive, or below expectations.

Guest evidence & score details

Yes, breakfast is generally worth booking. Guests praise the fresh, varied spread, hot options, fruit, pastries and made-to-order eggs, although some find it repetitive and coffee quality is mixed. It is a good fit for guests who want a substantial start without expecting a destination restaurant.

Breakfast281 reviews
18 disliked261 likedlast mentioned Oct 2026
Coffee32 reviews
7 disliked25 likedlast mentioned Aug 2026
On-site restaurant and bar17 reviews
6 disliked11 likedlast mentioned Oct 2026

What guests liked

The breakfast choice was very good with fresh fruit and hot choices

Booking.com · rated 9/10 · March 2026 · Double Room

The loose leaf mint tea was delicious and my husband really enjoyed the bean to cup coffee machine

Booking.com · rated 9/10 · September 2024 · Superior Double or Twin Room

What guests complained about

The breakfast could be more varied

Booking.com · rated 8/10 · January 2026 · Superior Double or Twin Room

the coffee machine could have been better

Booking.com · rated 10/10 · December 2025 · Superior Double or Twin Room
How we got to 8.2
Supports the score
  • Breakfast is described as varied, fresh, and high quality in several supplied reviews.
  • Photographs show a substantial buffet with hot dishes, pastries, fruit, preserves, drinks, and seating.
  • Eggs can be prepared to order.
Pulls the score down
  • Some supplied reviews describe breakfast as limited, repetitive, or below expectations.
  • Coffee feedback is mixed, including a complaint about the coffee machine.
  • The dining area appears compact, and evidence is insufficient to establish typical crowding.

Evidence confidence: higher. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.

Is the pool as good as the photos?

Pool

7.0/10
8.8Agoda · 27 ratings

126 reviews about this · 9 photos available · analyzed Oct 2026.

Guests rate this 8.8 (city average 7.2); our evidence assessment is 7.0. These use different methods and samples; the detail below explains our assessment.

The pool is a pleasant courtyard feature, but it is not reliably the spacious retreat photos may suggest.

Check before bookingGuest descriptions conflict on size: some call it large, while others call it very small and shallow.

Guest evidence & score details

The pool is a pleasant courtyard feature, but it is not reliably the spacious retreat photos may suggest. Guests praise its cleanliness, garden setting and relaxing atmosphere, while reports differ on its size and depth; cold water and limited sun are also mentioned. It suits cooling off and lounging, not serious swimming or guaranteed peace.

  • Viewfrom 9 photos
    5.0
  • Cleanlinessguest review evidence
    8.0
  • Matches the photosphotos checked against reviews
    6.0
Pool126 reviews
15 disliked111 likedlast mentioned Oct 2026

What guests liked

Great pool in a beautiful garden

Booking.com · rated 9/10 · May 2026 · Superior Double or Twin Room

What guests complained about

Several young children in small pool/courtyard don't allow for relaxation

Booking.com · rated 8/10 · August 2025 · Double Room
How we got to 7.0

Overall score reflects a documented outdoor courtyard pool with many positive comments about relaxation, cleanliness and appearance. It is reduced by conflicting size descriptions, a report that it is very small and shallow, cold water and limited sun exposure. The corpus statistic supports broad positive sentiment but is a lower-bound detection, not prevalence; the recent evidence does not indicate an active closure or unusable facility.

Supports the score
  • Outdoor pool in a landscaped courtyard.
  • Guests describe the pool area as relaxing, clean and enjoyable.
  • Pool towels are mentioned as available.
Pulls the score down
  • Guest descriptions conflict on size: some call it large, while others call it very small and shallow.
  • One guest reports cold water and limited sun exposure.
  • No verified dimensions or lap-swimming suitability are supplied.

Evidence confidence: moderate. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.

How well placed is it, really?

Location and getting around

7.0/10
8.5Agoda · 27 ratings

81 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026.

Guests rate this 8.5 (city average 8.3); our evidence assessment is 7.0. These use different methods and samples; the detail below explains our assessment.

The location is calm and attractive but not especially central.

Check before bookingSeveral reviews describe the hotel as distant from major attractions or the city centre.

Guest evidence & score details

The location is calm and attractive but not especially central. Cafés, restaurants and local transport are nearby, and taxis or ride-hailing are convenient, while major sights can require a longer walk or transport and aircraft noise is a risk. It works best for guests who value a residential neighbourhood over being beside the main attractions.

  • Walkabilitymeasured from the map
    6.5
  • Sightseeing accessmeasured from the map
    6.0
  • Taxi convenienceguest review evidence
    8.0
  • Neighbourhood quietguest review evidence
    6.0
Walking distance to things34 reviews
11 disliked23 likedlast mentioned Sept 2026
Feeling safe25 reviews
6 disliked19 likedlast mentioned Jul 2026
Public transport18 reviews
10 disliked7 likedlast mentioned Mar 2026
Taxis and ride-hailing18 reviews
6 disliked11 likedlast mentioned Oct 2026

What guests liked

Easy to walk to Estela and other lovely parts of the city

Booking.com · rated 10/10 · July 2026 · Double Room

Plus it's actually very convenient that you can buy public transport cards from the reception

Booking.com · rated 9/10 · January 2025 · Triple Room

What guests complained about

not much in walking distance

Booking.com · rated 8/10 · September 2026 · Superior Double or Twin Room

Slightly out of the main area with limited public transport

Booking.com · rated 10/10 · February 2026 · Superior Double or Twin Room
How we got to 7.0

Good but not exceptional overall location: the immediate residential setting has substantial nearby amenities and positive safety/quiet feedback, while distance from major attractions, limited transport and aircraft-noise reports reduce convenience.

Supports the score
  • Quiet residential setting with cafés, restaurants, groceries and public transport within the supplied nearby search area.
  • Reviews describe the area as safe, calm and attractive.
  • Ride-hailing is reported as an easy workaround.
Pulls the score down
  • Several reviews describe the hotel as distant from major attractions or the city centre.
  • Public transport is available nearby, but reviews also describe it as limited or inconvenient.
  • Some supplied reviews report aircraft noise.

Evidence confidence: moderate. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.

Can you work or take calls from the room?

Wi-Fi

4.0/10

3 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026.

Wi-Fi is the weakest practical feature for remote work.

Check before bookingThree stored reviews explicitly complain about Wi‑Fi or internet; all three complaints are within the last two years.

Guest evidence & score details

Wi-Fi is the weakest practical feature for remote work. It is available, but recent guests report connection problems and there is no evidence that it supports reliable video calls. Do not choose this hotel for important online work without a backup connection.

  • Reliabilityguest review evidence
    4.0
  • Video callsguest review evidence
    3.0
Wi-Fi and internet3 reviews
3 disliked0 likedlast mentioned May 2026
How we got to 4.0
Supports the score
  • Wi‑Fi is listed as available.
  • No connection speeds are supplied.
  • The stored corpus contains no detected praise for Wi‑Fi.
Pulls the score down
  • Three stored reviews explicitly complain about Wi‑Fi or internet; all three complaints are within the last two years.
  • The latest detected complaint is within the last 180 days.
  • No evidence establishes suitability for video calls.

Evidence confidence: higher. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.

Is the desk usable for a working day?

Working from the room

5.5/10

4 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026.

The room can handle light laptop use, but it is not a dependable full-day workspace.

Check before bookingOne supplied review requests softer chairs in standard rooms.

Guest evidence & score details

The room can handle light laptop use, but it is not a dependable full-day workspace. Photos show a desk or table near a window, yet guests mention hard chairs, dark rooms and limited table space. It suits occasional emails better than a long working day.

  • Chairfrom the photos
    4.0
  • Natural lightfrom the photos
    6.0
Wi-Fi and internet3 reviews
3 disliked0 likedlast mentioned May 2026
Desk and working space1 review
1 disliked0 likedlast mentioned Oct 2026
How we got to 5.5

A usable desk or table and chair are documented, including multiple room photographs and the property's listed desk facility. However, supplied reviews identify chair comfort and table provision as limitations, while natural light appears variable. Dimensions, outlet placement, and monitor suitability are not established.

Supports the score
  • A desk or table with a chair is visible in multiple room photographs.
  • The workspace is generally positioned near a window in the supplied photographs.
Pulls the score down
  • One supplied review requests softer chairs in standard rooms.
  • One supplied review reports a dark room.
  • A supplied review says a table and two chairs would be preferable.

Evidence confidence: higher. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.

Is there anywhere to train?

Gym

Not on site

1 review about this · analyzed Oct 2026. Limited evidence: treat this assessment as provisional.

There is no documented gym, so this hotel is a poor choice if training on site matters.

Check before bookingNo gym is documented in the supplied facilities or photographs.

Guest evidence & score details

There is no documented gym, so this hotel is a poor choice if training on site matters. Guests have specifically wished for a small gym, with no supplied evidence of an alternative fitness space. Plan to exercise elsewhere.

Gym1 review
1 disliked0 likedlast mentioned Aug 2025
How we got to 0.0

Score 0: no gym is documented in the supplied hotel facilities or photographs, and the supplied review indicates that a gym was absent. The corpus statistics also record one detected gym complaint, but do not establish prevalence.

Pulls the score down
  • No gym is documented in the supplied facilities or photographs.
  • A supplied review says, "Een kleine gym was misschien leuk geweest?"

Evidence confidence: higher. This is a model assessment, not a statistical probability. Limited or inconsistent sources reduce confidence.

Is it worth the money?

Price and value

6.0/10
9.2Agoda · 27 ratings

16 reviews about this · analyzed Oct 2026.

Guests rate this 9.2 (city average 8.0); our evidence assessment is 6.0. These use different methods and samples; the detail below explains our assessment.

Value for money is inconsistent rather than a clear win. Some guests call it excellent value, especially alongside attentive service, while others find the room quality not worth the price. It is most defensible when booked for the atmosphere, breakfast and staff at a competitive rate.

Guest evidence & score details
Value for money16 reviews
5 disliked11 likedlast mentioned Aug 2026

What guests liked

Excellent value for money and very attentive excellent service

Booking.com · rated 8/10 · February 2025 · Double Room

What guests complained about

Room was like a motel not worth the money

Booking.com · rated 6/10 · November 2025 · Double Room

Patterns in the reviews we analyzed

What to check before you commit

Patterns from 598 analyzed reviews. Use them to ask better questions: review counts are not a prediction of your stay, and text interpretation can miss nuance.

Noise

Higher concern

38 of 598 reviews contain a complaint about this.

See the pattern & what to do

38 of 139 classified opinions about this were negative — 27% of these opinions. 35 of those are from the last 730 days. 142 of 598 reviews mention it at all.

Only one problem: the noise in the hallway almost all night from other guests entering and exiting or talking in the hall

Booking.com · rated 8/10 · February 2025 · Double Room

While the room was nice we were woken up every night due to noise from the other rooms

Booking.com · rated 8/10 · October 2024 · Double Room

There is quite a bit of noise from the rooms upstairs

Booking.com · rated 9/10 · September 2024 · Double Room
What you can do about it
  • Request a room away from the reception and breakfast area.
  • Ask for a room away from hallways, the elevator and upper-floor foot traffic.
  • If sensitive to noise, request a room less exposed to aircraft noise and confirm the available room location before arrival.

Soundproofing between rooms

Higher concern

18 of 598 reviews contain a complaint about this.

See the pattern & what to do

18 of 20 classified opinions about this were negative — 90% of these opinions. 18 of those are from the last 730 days. 20 of 598 reviews mention it at all.

Room was not very soundproof (rm 32) could hear guests in adjacent room talking

Booking.com · rated 8/10 · September 2025 · Double Room

The standard rooms are not very soundproof

Booking.com · rated 7/10 · January 2025 · Double Room

The could improve the soundproofing

Booking.com · rated 8/10 · November 2024 · Superior Double or Twin Room

Smells and damp

Moderate concern

7 of 598 reviews contain a complaint about this.

See the pattern & what to do

7 of 8 classified opinions about this were negative — 88% of these opinions. 7 of those are from the last 730 days. 8 of 598 reviews mention it at all.

the showerhead was broken and dirty and there was black mould all over the shower

Booking.com · rated 5/10 · July 2025 · Double Room

There was sewage smell in the room sometimes

Booking.com · rated 9/10 · April 2025 · Double Room

Some mould in the shower

Booking.com · rated 9/10 · May 2026 · Superior Double or Twin Room

Construction and roadworks

Lower concern

3 of 598 reviews contain a complaint about this.

See the pattern & what to do

3 of 3 classified opinions about this were negative — 100% of these opinions. 3 of those are from the last 730 days. 3 of 598 reviews mention it at all.

Reasons guests were glad they booked

The bright spots in guest feedback

Staff and service

302 reviewers praised it, 17 complained · 95% of opinions positive

Read a guest’s words

It is a wonderful relaxing small hotel with very friendly helpful staff

Booking.com · rated 8/10 · June 2026 · Superior Double or Twin Room

Breakfast

261 reviewers praised it, 18 complained · 94% of opinions positive

Read a guest’s words

The breakfast choice was very good with fresh fruit and hot choices

Booking.com · rated 9/10 · March 2026 · Double Room

Pool

111 reviewers praised it, 15 complained · 88% of opinions positive

Read a guest’s words

Great pool in a beautiful garden

Booking.com · rated 9/10 · May 2026 · Superior Double or Twin Room

Noise, any source

101 reviewers praised it, 38 complained · 73% of opinions positive

Read a guest’s words

The room was very quiet and nice with art on the walls

Booking.com · rated 10/10 · February 2026 · Double Room

Cleanliness

83 reviewers praised it, 4 complained · 95% of opinions positive

Read a guest’s words

Everywhere was spotlessly clean and the staff were professional and friendly

Booking.com · rated 10/10 · October 2026 · Superior Double or Twin Room

Get a feel for the neighbourhood

The world outside the lobby

20 mapped places sit within a five-minute walk. Distances are straight-line, converted to walking time at 80 m per minute with a 25% detour allowance.

Landmarks and transport

  • KoPo Mart0.244 km
  • R. Garcia Orta0.257 km
  • Mude0.3 km
  • Park Necessidades0.5 km
  • Don Mueang Airport10683.24 km
  • Khao San Road10686.01 km
  • Grand Palace10686.21 km
  • Siam10689.96 km

We have no confirmed rail or metro station in this map sample. Check the public-transport places below and verify the route to your destinations.

Explore food, transport and everyday essentials nearby

Eating and drinking

Bars5 mapped · 1 within 5 min
Restaurants5 mapped · 3 within 5 min

Cafés and workspaces

Cafés5 mapped · 3 within 5 min
Coworking5 mapped · 1 within 5 min

Everyday essentials

Groceries5 mapped · 2 within 5 min
Pharmacies5 mapped · 2 within 5 min
Laundry5 mapped · 1 within 5 min
Convenience5 mapped

Getting around

Public transport5 mapped · 3 within 5 min

Exercise

Gyms5 mapped · 1 within 5 min
Yoga studios5 mapped · 3 within 5 min
Bouldering & climbing1 mapped

Green space

Parks4 mapped

Worth knowing about

Late-night venues1 mapped

Turn the findings into a better stay

Confirm these details before booking

Reviews and photos describe other people’s stays. The terms and room assigned to your reservation matter just as much.

For your reservation

  • Exact room category, bed arrangement and maximum occupancy; requests such as a high floor may not be guaranteed.
  • Total price for your dates, including taxes, service fees, breakfast and any deposit.
  • Cancellation deadline, payment timing and whether the rate is refundable.
  • Current opening hours, closures or extra charges for the facilities you need.

Questions raised by this hotel’s evidence

  • Which room locations are quietest, and can a quiet room be guaranteed?
  • Could you share recent photos of the exact room category and bathroom I would book?
  • Is the in-room Wi-Fi currently reliable for video calls, and is a recent speed test available?
  • Which pool and garden areas remain shaded during the hottest part of the day?

Observations for specific dates, not a quote

What it costs

These are historical observations, not live availability. Room types, occupancy, taxes and cancellation rules may differ between samples. Check the final total with the provider.

USD 117–234per night on sampled dates · historical observations

See sample dates and recorded rates
USD 2342026-10-24 → 2026-10-26booking.com
USD 1222026-12-09 → 2026-12-11booking.com
USD 1172027-01-08 → 2027-01-10booking.com
USD 1672026-11-09 → 2026-11-11google_travel

Good value when: Likely better on the lower observed rates, especially around $117–$122 nightly before taxes.

Poor value when: More questionable at the observed $234.12 nightly rate, particularly when room quality or size falls short of expectations.

Short answers

Common questions about Jardim da Lapa by Shiadu

Is Jardim da Lapa by Shiadu noisy?

142 of 598 reviews mention noise. Of the 142 reviewers mentioning it, 38 described a problem and 101 described it positively. These are counts of the collected reviews, not all guests. Separately, 3 reviews mention construction or roadworks nearby, 3 of them in the last two years, most recently 2026-05-28.

Jump to the detail

Is Jardim da Lapa by Shiadu in a good location?

20 mapped places sit within a five-minute walk. No rail or metro station was identified in the mapped data. Check public transport and practical routes before booking. 23 reviewers praise how much is walkable from the door.

Jump to the detail

Is breakfast at Jardim da Lapa by Shiadu worth it?

281 reviews mention breakfast. 261 described it positively and 18 described a problem.

Jump to the detail

Is the pool at Jardim da Lapa by Shiadu any good?

It scores 7.0/10 here. 126 reviews mention the pool, 15 of them as a complaint. Overall score reflects a documented outdoor courtyard pool with many positive comments about relaxation, cleanliness and appearance. It is reduced by conflicting size descriptions, a report that it is very small and shallow, cold water and limited sun exposure. The corpus statistic supports broad positive sentiment but is a lower-bound detection, not prevalence; the recent evidence does not indicate an active closure or unusable facility.

Jump to the detail

How much does Jardim da Lapa by Shiadu cost per night?

Rates we observed for the listed sample dates ran USD 117 to USD 234 a night, with a midpoint around USD 145. Prices move with dates and room type.

Jump to the detail

Who should not book Jardim da Lapa by Shiadu?

Noise-sensitive sleepers.; Guests requiring dependable room Wi-Fi or video calls.; Travelers needing a gym or a lap-swimming pool.; Guests unwilling to risk room-size, light or maintenance variation..

Jump to the detail

Working while you stay

Places to work near Jardim da Lapa by Shiadu

Reviewed coworking spaces and work-friendly cafés within 3 km in a straight line. Check the actual journey, opening hours and any day-pass or laptop rules before you go.

LACS Santos

Coworking space · 470 m away · LodgeLens rating 6.9/10

Consider LACS Santos if you want a staffed professional base with community activity and can confirm a proper desk or book a suitable room.

Read the review →

Nuno Space

Coworking space · 860 m away · LodgeLens rating 7.1/10

Shortlist Nuno Space for a monthly base, not as a dependable walk-in workspace.

Read the review →

See the best coworking spaces in Lisbon →

Same neighbourhood, different stay

Other reviewed hotels near Jardim da Lapa by Shiadu

Hotels we have analysed within about 1.5 km in a straight line. Compare the trade-offs before you choose.

JAM Lisbon

550 m away · strongest: staff and service 8.0/10

A stylish, well-located hotel with friendly staff, generally good rooms and family-oriented facilities.

Read the review →

Docas Hotel Lisbon

1.5 km away · strongest: cleanliness and condition 9.0/10

A modern, well-reviewed waterfront hotel with excellent service, cleanliness, design, breakfast and workspaces.

Read the review →

Compare what matters to your stay

Other hotels and focused shortlists

These comparisons use hotels in our analyzed collection. Follow a hotel’s review to check its trade-offs and source coverage.

Compare the Lisbon hotels we have analyzed →

ME by Meliá Lisbon

Sleep and noise scores 9.0/10 in our analysis, compared with 6.0/10 here.

Sleep and noise: 9.0/10 · 11 reviews about this

Trade-off: Remote workers needing a verified ergonomic workspace and dependable video-call connectivity

Read the supporting evidence →

Docas Hotel Lisbon

Cleanliness and condition scores 9.0/10 in our analysis, compared with 6.5/10 here.

Cleanliness and condition: 9.0/10 · 39 reviews about this

Trade-off: Light sleepers who require reliably quiet surroundings.

Read the supporting evidence →

Next step

Not sure this is the right one?

LodgeLens ranks properties against what you personally need — quiet, a real desk, a pool worth using, a specific budget — instead of a single average score. Tell us what matters and we will send a shortlist for your dates.

Build my shortlist

What supports this review

Read with these limitations

598 reviews analyzed across 8 languages. Latest guest review: October 2026. 261 reviews from the last 12 months. Analysis: October 2026. How our analysis works

Sample dates: Sept 2024–Oct 2026. Average stay rating 9.1/10, normalized across sources. The latest 12 months average -0.0 points versus the full sample; changing guests and sources can affect this.

  • No written Google reviews were collected.
  • Some review sources are missing or need refreshing.
Review sources, sample sizes and collection dates
Booking.com589 reviews collectedSource collected · October 2026
Google0 reviews collected · 469 advertised by sourceReview evidence unavailable · October 2026
Agoda9 reviews collectedSource collected · October 2026

Our sample is not every review or every stay. Missing evidence does not establish that a facility is absent or a problem is resolved.

How this page was made

We hold 598 reviews for this property and analyzed 598 reviews across 8 languages. Text matching and AI interpretation can miss nuance, sarcasm or translations. Repeated experiences, larger samples and independent sources are more useful than a single vivid quote.

Quotes, however, are only ever drawn from the 165 English reviews. Machine-translating a guest’s sentence would change their original wording.

We count mentions using text patterns. Complaints can come from a reviewer’s “disliked” field or negative wording in their review. These counts describe the reviews we hold, not the proportion of all guests who experienced an issue. “Recent” means the last 730 days.

Scores, section explanations and photo descriptions come from a model reading the source material using AI, last run 10 October 2026. Published photos may be old, staged or incomplete; AI cannot measure a room or verify a facility is currently open. Nearby places are mapped within 1500 m; walking times are estimates, not checked routes. Prices are observations for sample dates and will move.

We link to a review or its source page when an address is available. Source, rating, and month accompany quotes to help you locate them. Some links open a collection of reviews rather than the individual quote.